1994
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality of Brief Family Interaction and Satisfaction Scales among Couples from Eight Western and Midwestern States

Abstract: The Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale, the Kansas Parental Satisfaction Scale, a version for couples of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES III), and three subscales from the Marital Communication Inventory were subjected to common factor analysis using data from 1222 rural, heterosexual couples, husbands and wives from eight western and midwestern states in the United States. The analysis supported the expected dimensionality of the Marital Communication Inventory and the two satisfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 ϭ extremely dissatisfied to 7 ϭ extremely satisfied). This scale has been used in various studies to assess family relationship satisfaction (e.g., Chang et al, 1994) and exhibited adequate internal consistency for mothers (␣ ϭ .81) and college students (␣ ϭ .82) in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 ϭ extremely dissatisfied to 7 ϭ extremely satisfied). This scale has been used in various studies to assess family relationship satisfaction (e.g., Chang et al, 1994) and exhibited adequate internal consistency for mothers (␣ ϭ .81) and college students (␣ ϭ .82) in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Communication patterns were evaluated with a short form of the Marital Communication Inventory (Chang, Schumm, Coulson, Bollman, & Jurich, 1994). This 14-item version of the scale is scored for three subscales: Supportive Discussion (e.g., “We take the time just to talk things over”; α = .82), Aversive Communication (e.g., “My partner and I find it hard to disagree without losing our tempers”; α = .73), and Communication Apprehension (e.g., “I fail to express disagreement with my partner for fear s/he will get angry with me”; α = .72).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated internal consistencies of this measure in a variety of populations from different cultures indicating good internal consistencies (e.g., Chang, Schumm, Coulson, Bollman, & Jurich, 1994). The instrument was translated to Hebrew through back translation procedure and was found to have good internal consistency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%