2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10802-014-9919-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of Oppositional Defiant Disorder in Young Children: Model Comparisons, Gender and Longitudinal Invariance

Abstract: Identifying the latent structure of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) may have important clinical and research implications. The present study compared existing dimensional models of ODD for model fit and examined the metric and scalar invariance of the best-fitting model. Study participants were a diverse (38.8% minority, 49.1% boys) community sample of 796 children. Parents completed the Child Symptom Inventory and the DISC-YC ODD scales at child ages of 4, 5 and 6-7 years. When comparing single-factor (DS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the three-factor UK/DSM-5 model was adopted for use in DSM-5, researchers will be particularly interested in the association of its dimensions with symptoms of subsequent disorders. A recent study (Lavigne, Bryant, Hopkins, & Gouze, submitted for publication), however, indicates that the UK/DSM-5 model is not invariant across gender and age, at least in a sample of young children. Data from this study also showed that, compared to all of the other dimensional models (including the UK-DSM-5 model), the Pitt-2 model showed better model fit for both boys and girls and both genders combined at ages 4, 5, and 6.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because the three-factor UK/DSM-5 model was adopted for use in DSM-5, researchers will be particularly interested in the association of its dimensions with symptoms of subsequent disorders. A recent study (Lavigne, Bryant, Hopkins, & Gouze, submitted for publication), however, indicates that the UK/DSM-5 model is not invariant across gender and age, at least in a sample of young children. Data from this study also showed that, compared to all of the other dimensional models (including the UK-DSM-5 model), the Pitt-2 model showed better model fit for both boys and girls and both genders combined at ages 4, 5, and 6.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From a measurement perspective, this study, as well as others (Burke & Loeber, 2010;Herzhoff & Tackett, 2015;Lavigne et al, 2014), have identified an item assignment for ODD subdimensions that is statistically robust, but is not the model proposed in DSM-5. This presents a problem for researchers in this area as it is not clear which is preferable to use when testing alternative models.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Previous studies have shown that the ODD subdimension structure of the PGS data is best organized according to factors of irritability, defiant behaviour and antagonisticness using exploratory factor analysis (Burke et al., 2010). The superiority of this item assignment compared to alternate models has been confirmed in recent studies testing two and three factor CFA models in unique large datasets (Herzhoff & Tackett, 2015;Lavigne et al, 2014). Each of these studies, as well as Burke et al (2014), have also shown the superiority of two or three factor ODD models with this item assignment to be superior to a single ODD factor including all 8 items.With group-based trajectory modeling, individual variation over time is considered to be normally distributed within groups which each have distinct growth patterns.…”
Section: Data Analytic Planmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Recent studies also provided empirical support for the two-dimension structure of ODD symptoms. For example, Lavigne et al (2015) examined the metric and scalar of existing models to identify whether ODD consisted of multiple dimensions. The results suggested that the two-dimension model optimally represented the dimensionality of ODD symptoms (Lavigne et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lavigne et al (2015) examined the metric and scalar of existing models to identify whether ODD consisted of multiple dimensions. The results suggested that the two-dimension model optimally represented the dimensionality of ODD symptoms (Lavigne et al, 2015). Symptoms of affective dimension included being touchy, short-tempered, spiteful, and resentful to others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%