1979
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1979.28.733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimethyl Sulfoxide Enhancement of Phlebotomus Fever Virus Plaque Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CER cell line has been recognized as the most efficient cell line currently available for the growth of CCHF virus (5, 7). Clerx et al (7) produced plaques in CER cells by using the overlay method of McCown et al (12) and incorporating dimethyl sulfoxide and DEAE-dextran, but in the present study we produced plaques by incorporating dimethyl sulfoxide alone. Although it is less sensitive than mouse inoculation for the titration and isolation of CCHF virus, the plaque assay is of equivalent sensitivity to the fluorescence focus assay and is more convenient to perform and easier to read than the latter test in virus titration and neutralization tests, particularly when large numbers of specimens are involved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The CER cell line has been recognized as the most efficient cell line currently available for the growth of CCHF virus (5, 7). Clerx et al (7) produced plaques in CER cells by using the overlay method of McCown et al (12) and incorporating dimethyl sulfoxide and DEAE-dextran, but in the present study we produced plaques by incorporating dimethyl sulfoxide alone. Although it is less sensitive than mouse inoculation for the titration and isolation of CCHF virus, the plaque assay is of equivalent sensitivity to the fluorescence focus assay and is more convenient to perform and easier to read than the latter test in virus titration and neutralization tests, particularly when large numbers of specimens are involved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…For SFSV, concentrations were determined by a plaque assay as described earlier (6,18 in sterile water). After 4 days, a second layer of agar mixture, containing 60 g/ml neutral red, was added.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SFN and TOS were determined by a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) as described by Earley and colleagues [13] but modified according to McCown and colleagues [14] by adding Sandfly fever antibodies among Cypriots dextran, dimethyl sulfoxide (1 %) and heparin (20 units/ml) to the agar overlay. The second overlay containing neutral red was added on day 4 for SFS and TOS and on day 7 for SFN.…”
Section: Serological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%