1981
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimethyl sulfoxide prevents DNA nicking mediated by ionizing radiation or iron/hydrogen peroxide-generated hydroxyl radical.

Abstract: Eighty percent of the single-strand DNA breaks induced by y-irradiation were prevented by the hydroxyl radical (-OH) scavenger dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO); CH4 was generated in the process as a product of the interaction of -OH and Me2SO. In contrast, Me SO completely blocked DNA nicking by an iron/ H202 system which produces -OH but smaller amounts of CH4 from Me2SO. Because Me2SO prevented DNA breaks from the more efficient iron/H202 system but only blocked 80% of irradiation-mediated nicking, the results sug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
77
3
Order By: Relevance
“…DMSO is known to be a scavenger of the hydroxyl radical and it is possible that low concentrations of DMSO will be protective in cochlear cultures (Repine et al, 1981). However, this should be regarded as speculative at this time since there is no direct evidence for a protective effect in our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…DMSO is known to be a scavenger of the hydroxyl radical and it is possible that low concentrations of DMSO will be protective in cochlear cultures (Repine et al, 1981). However, this should be regarded as speculative at this time since there is no direct evidence for a protective effect in our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In complex systems, therefore, one has no way of knowing what fraction of the HO radicals was actually trapped, or in turn the total number of HO radicals produced. Thus, to quantify the number of HO radicals created, the concentration of the trapping agent must be relatively high, in practice about 0.1 M or greater [2,20,21] so that the probability that an HO will react with the trapping agent, rather than a host biomolecule, is large. The low toxicity of DMSO makes such experiments possible [1,16,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 to 1.0 M [32,52,53] to trap the major portion of HO radicals generated and thus estimate their true abundance. Fortunately, DMSO is an extremely nontoxic [54,55] and rapidly penetrating molecular probe that can be tolerated by living tissues in adequately high concentrations [54,[56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Preliminary Tests Of the Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%