2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-005-0012-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diminished embryonic movements of developing embryo by direct exposure of sidestream whole smoke solutions

Abstract: Embryonic movements (EM) are considered to be the first sign of life and cigarette smoking during pregnancy has been linked to affect EM. Exposure to sidestream smoke, produced from the emissions of a smoldering cigarette, may result in poor pregnancy outcome and increased risk of serious perinatal morbidity and mortality. In this study, the chicken embryo bioassay was used to systematically assess the effects of short-term exposure to sidestream whole smoke solutions (SSWSS) on EM, recorded in real time by a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next open questions to be addressed are whether the test systems correctly identify further classes of developmental compounds and differentiate them from compounds acting by unspecific toxic mechanisms or substances that preferentially cause other types of toxicities. In the past and also presently developmental toxicity has mostly been tested in vivo (Lee et al, 2011[ 13 ], 2007[ 12 ]; Liu et al, 2010[ 15 ]; Moss et al, 2009[ 17 ]; Xi et al, 2009[ 26 ]; Oesch et al, 2008[ 18 ]; Stapleton and Chan, 2009[ 22 ]; Ejaz and Woong, 2006[ 3 ]). Although some first important steps have been achieved in this field of in vitro research there seems to be a long way to go until animal experiments in developmental toxicity can be fully replaced by alternative methods.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next open questions to be addressed are whether the test systems correctly identify further classes of developmental compounds and differentiate them from compounds acting by unspecific toxic mechanisms or substances that preferentially cause other types of toxicities. In the past and also presently developmental toxicity has mostly been tested in vivo (Lee et al, 2011[ 13 ], 2007[ 12 ]; Liu et al, 2010[ 15 ]; Moss et al, 2009[ 17 ]; Xi et al, 2009[ 26 ]; Oesch et al, 2008[ 18 ]; Stapleton and Chan, 2009[ 22 ]; Ejaz and Woong, 2006[ 3 ]). Although some first important steps have been achieved in this field of in vitro research there seems to be a long way to go until animal experiments in developmental toxicity can be fully replaced by alternative methods.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%