2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diminished neural network dynamics after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury

Abstract: Over the past decade there has been increasing enthusiasm in the cognitive neurosciences around using network science to understand the system-level changes associated with brain disorders. A growing literature has used whole-brain fMRI analysis to examine changes in the brain’s subnetworks following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Much of network modeling in this literature has focused on static network mapping, which provides a window into gross inter-nodal relationships, but is insensitive to more subtle fluc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that PCS+ patients have two major states, state 2 and state 4, may contribute to the fact that PCS+ patients demonstrate reduced functional dynamics. Our findings are further supported by recent work demonstrating that network state occupancy rates for semi-acute mTBI patients differ from controls (Vergara et al, 2017b) as well as fewer state transitions in a chronic severe TBI population compared to controls (Gilbert et al, 2018). However, the authors provide evidence that the results were dependent on the specific preprocessing pipelines used suggesting a potential limitation to the findings outlined in this analysis.…”
Section: State Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that PCS+ patients have two major states, state 2 and state 4, may contribute to the fact that PCS+ patients demonstrate reduced functional dynamics. Our findings are further supported by recent work demonstrating that network state occupancy rates for semi-acute mTBI patients differ from controls (Vergara et al, 2017b) as well as fewer state transitions in a chronic severe TBI population compared to controls (Gilbert et al, 2018). However, the authors provide evidence that the results were dependent on the specific preprocessing pipelines used suggesting a potential limitation to the findings outlined in this analysis.…”
Section: State Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…While the majority of groups that investigated functional connectivity following mTBI have used static functional connectivity analysis, recently, groups have started to consider how dynamic changes in functional connectivity may be altered following mTBI (Mayer et al, 2015;Vergara et al, 2017a;Vergara et al, 2017b;Vergara et al, 2018) as well as moderate and severe TBI (Gilbert et al, 2018). In spite of differences in methodology, these groups have presented variable levels of success in using dynamic functional connectivity measures, either globally or within individual sub-networks, to both characterize and discriminate TBI populations from control groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These secondary neural injuries are associated with biomechanical, structural and functional changes in the damaged brain regions and corresponding homologous regions structurally or functionally connected with them [37,38]. Subsequently, they cause the inefficiency of neural networks and imbalance of neurotransmitter systems regulating affective and cognitive behaviors [39,40], that seem to contribute in the occurrence of sleep disorders [41,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Functional integration is inherently multi-scale; that is, it coordinates neurons, micro-columns, and macroscopic regions (which form functional networks) and also organizes large-scale network interactions. Ongoing network interactions reflect higher-order functional organization in the brain, which is related to one's character and cognitive performance (Vidaurre et al, 2019) and is modulated in various disorders (Du et al, 2018;Díezcirarda et al, 2018;Gilbert et al, 2018;Rashid et al, 2018;de Lacy and Calhoun, 2019;Espinoza et al, 2019;Fu et al, 2019). So far, a good number of IPS studies have relied on (anatomical) atlases (Ponce-Alvarez et al, 2015;Cabral et al, 2017;Lord et al, 2019) or have investigated few functional networks (Chang and Glover, 2010); some have not been concerned with the recurrence of IPS modes (Pedersen et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019) or their recurrence characterizations have not been purely phase-based 2 (Yaesoubi et al, 2015(Yaesoubi et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%