2015
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dinuclear Face‐Sharing Bi‐octahedral Tungsten(VI) Core and Unusual Thermal Behavior in Complex Th Tungstates

Abstract: Two new thorium tungstates A6 Th6 (WO4 )14 O (A=K and Rb) were synthesized by high-temperature solid-state reactions. The structures of both phases are based on a rare dinuclear confacial bi-octahedral [W2 O9 ](6-) core, encapsulated in a [Th6 W7 O46 (W2 O9 )](32-) cage showing a cross-section geometry similar to a six-leafed lily. The adjacent cages are connected in two dimensional layers by WO4 tetrahedral linkers. Due to the dissimilarities in mutual orientations of adjacent layers in these two structures, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ternary oxides such as CaWO 4 , which adopt the common Scheelite structure, exhibit the tetrahedral coordination environment, whereas Ln 6 WO 12 (Ln = Y, Ho, Er, Yb), La 2 W 2 O 9 (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd), M 2 (UO 2 )­(W 2 O 8 ) (M = Na, K), Ba 3 WO 6 , Ba 2 WO 5 , Ba 3 W 2 O 9 , Ba 3 MWO 6 (M= Mg, Zn), and Ba 3 Fe 2 WO 9 all contain tungsten in an octahedral coordination environment. The latter coordination environment is rather common in tungstates and is found as isolated, ,, corner-shared, , and edge-shared , motifs; very few examples, such as Ba 3 W 2 O 9 , A 6 Th 6 (WO 4 ) 14 O (A = K and Rb), and La 18 W 10 O 57 , contain tungsten in a face-shared coordination environment due to the electrostatic repulsion between the highly charged metal centers. , An exception to this generalization is found for cases where tungsten is present as W­(III), W­(IV), or W­(V), , which sufficiently reduces the tungsten–tungsten repulsion and where potential metal–metal bonding interactions can stabilize the arrangement. In a small number of reported structures, tungsten is found in other less common coordination environments that include distorted cubic coordination in Y 2 WO 6 , trigonal bipyramidal coordination in Ca 3 WO 5 Cl 2 , seven-coordinated WO 7 polyhedra in Re 10 W 22 O 81 (Ce, Nd), , and a trigonal prismatic arrangement in the oxychloride Ln 3 WO 6 Cl 3 (Ln = La, Pr). , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ternary oxides such as CaWO 4 , which adopt the common Scheelite structure, exhibit the tetrahedral coordination environment, whereas Ln 6 WO 12 (Ln = Y, Ho, Er, Yb), La 2 W 2 O 9 (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd), M 2 (UO 2 )­(W 2 O 8 ) (M = Na, K), Ba 3 WO 6 , Ba 2 WO 5 , Ba 3 W 2 O 9 , Ba 3 MWO 6 (M= Mg, Zn), and Ba 3 Fe 2 WO 9 all contain tungsten in an octahedral coordination environment. The latter coordination environment is rather common in tungstates and is found as isolated, ,, corner-shared, , and edge-shared , motifs; very few examples, such as Ba 3 W 2 O 9 , A 6 Th 6 (WO 4 ) 14 O (A = K and Rb), and La 18 W 10 O 57 , contain tungsten in a face-shared coordination environment due to the electrostatic repulsion between the highly charged metal centers. , An exception to this generalization is found for cases where tungsten is present as W­(III), W­(IV), or W­(V), , which sufficiently reduces the tungsten–tungsten repulsion and where potential metal–metal bonding interactions can stabilize the arrangement. In a small number of reported structures, tungsten is found in other less common coordination environments that include distorted cubic coordination in Y 2 WO 6 , trigonal bipyramidal coordination in Ca 3 WO 5 Cl 2 , seven-coordinated WO 7 polyhedra in Re 10 W 22 O 81 (Ce, Nd), , and a trigonal prismatic arrangement in the oxychloride Ln 3 WO 6 Cl 3 (Ln = La, Pr). , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a subtle change in the ratio results in a completely different structure of Na 2 Th(AsO 4 ) 2 , which is a 3D framework structure built from the ThO 8 polyhedra and AsO 4 tetrahedra. (1) and Na 2 Th(PO 4 ) 2 significantly differ. There are five sodium atom, seven arsenic atoms and four thorium atoms in the asymmetric unit of 1, whereas, Na 2 Th(PO 4 ) 2 has four unique sodium, four phosphorus, and two thorium atoms in the asymmetric unit.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Structures In The Sodium Arsenates And Phomentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is noteworthy that the AsO 4 groups use all of its O atoms in bonding with Th atoms and play the role of tetradentate units with Q 4 , Q 22 , or Q 21 coordination types, where Q denotes denticity and the superscripts -number of vertex-, edge-, and face-sharing (the latter are absent in these cases) neighboring ThO n polyhedra. [50] (1). A graph representation of the tetranuclear FBBs in 1 (b), Rb 7 Th 2 P 6 Se 21 [45] (c), and Cs 4 Th 2 P 6 S 18 [45] (d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Th(1)−O bond distances range from 2.207(9) to 2.640(9) Å, and are slightly longer than those of Th(2), which range from 2.254(9) to 2.630(10) Å, but are still comparable with those in other thorium compounds. 33,46,47 These two ThO 9 polyhedra are connected with each other through common edges, resulting in corrugated Th layers that stretch along the bc plane (Figure 1b). It is of interest that such layers with the same topological linkages are also observed in a series of lanthanide-bearing tellurium compounds, M 2 Te 4 O 11 (M = La−Nd and Sm−Yb).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%