2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(99)00354-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dioxin incinerator emissions exposure study Times Beach, Missouri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution from the incinerator to the residents in the community by transpulmonary inhalation absorption cannot be measured. Evans et al (2000) conducted a study to determine whether living in the vicinity of a waste disposal incinerator increased the dioxin burden for individuals, who were also 18-65 yr old and recruited according to an atmospheric dispersion model. They also found no additional burden being added to the population with measurable dioxin associated with the incinerator emissions as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution from the incinerator to the residents in the community by transpulmonary inhalation absorption cannot be measured. Evans et al (2000) conducted a study to determine whether living in the vicinity of a waste disposal incinerator increased the dioxin burden for individuals, who were also 18-65 yr old and recruited according to an atmospheric dispersion model. They also found no additional burden being added to the population with measurable dioxin associated with the incinerator emissions as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some controversy (Kayajanian 2002;Cole et al 2003) based on studies that showed no correlations between health hazard, especially carcinogenesis, and dioxin emissions from solid waste incineration (Deml et al 1996;Evans et al 2000;Gonzalez et al 2000), chronic exposure to such contamination seems to represent risk to public health as well to the surrounding environment (Leem et al 2003;Yoshida et al 2003;Kuo et al 2008). Incineration is considered the appropriate fate for SHRS, despite the fact that it generates atmospheric pollution, including heavy metals, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofuranes (PCDFs), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), acid gases, and other deleterious organic materials (Sovocool et al 1988;Hong et al 2000;Kuo et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were randomly selected from an area that air-modeling projections indicated as a potentially high exposure area and compared to a randomly selected control group. TCDD serum levels and TEQ decreased from pre-incineration to four months into incineration and decreased further 11 months later, immediately after the end of the incineration; therefore incineration did not result in any measurable exposure to the population surrounding the plant (Evans et al 2000). Although conducted on a limited number of samples, the exposure assessment modeling and the repeated measurement design support the lack of TCDD exposure from incineration of TCDD contaminated material.…”
Section: General Populationmentioning
confidence: 77%