2018
DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2018.1536674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diplomacy in a Global Early Modernity: The Ambiguity of Sovereignty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This follows a typical ‘master narrative’ of modern diplomacy arising in Renaissance Italy before spreading across Europe and, later, the globe. This view of diplomacy is deeply contested and viewed as outdated by many historians (Krischer and Von Thiessen, 2019: 1100). 1 But the English School’s adherence to this interpretation reflects a wider problem within IR of being aloof from the wider debates in the scholarship of history.…”
Section: The English School’s Eurocentrismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows a typical ‘master narrative’ of modern diplomacy arising in Renaissance Italy before spreading across Europe and, later, the globe. This view of diplomacy is deeply contested and viewed as outdated by many historians (Krischer and Von Thiessen, 2019: 1100). 1 But the English School’s adherence to this interpretation reflects a wider problem within IR of being aloof from the wider debates in the scholarship of history.…”
Section: The English School’s Eurocentrismmentioning
confidence: 99%