“…(i.4) T\ 2 Also, the pressure distribution required to maintain the flow (1.3) is given by p~lp(r) = \A2r2 -\B2r~2 + 2A-B\nr (1.5) where p is the (constant) fluid density and B= (1.6) 2 ~ A r2 ~ ri Finally, the frictional couple exerted, per unit length, across a cylindrical surface in the fluid of radius r, rx <r <r2, is independent of r and is given by 2nr trg = ~mpQ (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7) where tr8 is the tangential stress. In deriving the relations (1.3), (1.5), (1.6), and (1.7), one writes the equilibrium Navier-Stokes equations (based on (1.1)) in cylindrical coordinates (r, 6, z) and looks for solutions, subject to (1.4), of the form vr = r = 0, vg-rd(r), vz = z = 0 (1.8) which can be supported by a pressure distribution p -p(r); in such a situation (1.1) reduces to tre~^^0er6 (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) where In recent work [4] Necas and Shilhavy have examined the foundations of a continuum mechanical theory for the response of a multipolar viscous fluid; the theory that is proposed in [4] is consistent with the second law of thermodynamics, in the form of the Clausius-Duhem inequality, and builds upon earlier work of Toupin [5], Green and Rivlin [6,7], and Bleustein and Green [8]. Bellout, Bloom, and Necas [9] explored several of the consequences of the theory formulated in [4] with emphasis on the isothermal, incompressible, bipolar case that is described below; special consideration was given in [9] to the nature of the velocity profiles predicted for several important cases of laminar flows at low viscosity.…”