1970
DOI: 10.1021/j100696a034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipole polarizabilities of ions in alkali halide crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
1
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has a long list of previously calculated and measured data, as has been reviewed in the paper of Iwadate and Kazuko [31] ) using a correlated coupled cluster approach. The polarizability of F -ion in the present work was evaluated to be in the range (1.52-1.71 Å 3 ) as shown in Table 1, and these are very close to those by Coker [33,34], Wilson and Curtis [35], Cohen [36] and Massen and Schmidt [37]. Similar behavior has been found for other negative ions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This has a long list of previously calculated and measured data, as has been reviewed in the paper of Iwadate and Kazuko [31] ) using a correlated coupled cluster approach. The polarizability of F -ion in the present work was evaluated to be in the range (1.52-1.71 Å 3 ) as shown in Table 1, and these are very close to those by Coker [33,34], Wilson and Curtis [35], Cohen [36] and Massen and Schmidt [37]. Similar behavior has been found for other negative ions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…5) with the experimental findings [21] of an absorption continuum starting around 60,600cm -1 (7.51 eV). At intermediate and large internuclear dis- [23], who found good agreement between the long-range part of their RKR-curve constructed for the B1X+ state and the model curve based only on F-and H + Coulomb attraction; small deviations could be explained by the fact that the contribution which results from the polarization of the F-ion has not been accounted for in their simple model [25]. A polynomial fit to the lower part of the calculated B 1X+ potential results in the values given in Table 5 and comparisons with corresponding experimental data [21] show that discrepancies lie in the range (less than 30 cm-1 in c%, approximately 0.1 bohr in equilibrium distance for relatively shallow surfaces and 0.15 eV in transition energies) generally encountered in such calculations; the results of the most recent other theoretical work [6] are also completely in line with the present data.…”
Section: A the Valence States 3h 1h 3s And B1x +mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is an effect that has long been recognized (for a discussion and references to early work see Wilson & Curtis, 1970), but is nevertheless often ignored by ascribing a constant polarizability to ions in crystals. Increasing Madelung potential at an anion site will result in decreased polarizability in the same way as it results in decreased size.…”
Section: Evidence For the Effect Of ~ On Imentioning
confidence: 99%