Direct and indirect effects of wastewater use and herd environment on the occurrence of animal diseases and animal health in Pakistan

Abstract

The use of wastewater for rearing domestic animals is a common phenomenon in most of the developing countries like Pakistan that face a serious shortage of freshwater resources. However, most of the literature has only focused on the indirect effects of wastewater use on animal health or productivity, and literature on the direct effects of wastewater use is rare. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the direct and indirect effects of wastewater usage on the prevalence of animal diseases and animal health in Pakistan. The study is based on a household-level survey of 360 domestic water buffalo herds collected from 12 districts of Punjab Province, Pakistan. We tested the prevalence of the animal's diseases, animal's health, and wastewater-use preference with various econometric tools, such as the Poisson, negative binomial, and logistic regressions. The findings of the study show that the majority of the farmers use wastewater for buffalo bathing due to the shortage of freshwater resources. Results explore the prevalence of diseases such as clinical mastitis, tick infestation, and foot and mouth disease at the farm level significantly associated with buffalo bathing in the wastewater. Moreover, bathing in wastewater pre- and post-milking also plays a role in the occurrence of diseases. Particularly, if the buffalo's access to wastewater for bathing is within 60 min after milking, the probability of the animals being exposed to mastitis is higher. Furthermore, on investigation, a number of factors are found, such as the distance to the water source, power shortage, groundwater availability, and the education of farmers that influence farmers' behavior of letting their animals take a bath in wastewater. Moreover, the use of different preventive measures improves the animal's health.

Gender gap in rice productivity: evidence from Vietnam

“…This effect is then divided into "male advantage" and "female disadvantage," and is calculated based on the deviation of the respective group coefficients of males and females using pooled estimates obtained from male advantage and female disadvantage. Furthermore, following (Elahi et al, 2015;Elahi, Abid, Zhang and Alugongo, 2017;Elahi, Zhang, Abid, Javed and Xinru, 2017;Elahi, Abid, Zhang, Weijun and Hasson, 2018;Elahi, Abid, Zhang, Ul Haq and Sahito, 2018), this study used a non-parametric approach (Mann -Whitney test) to compare the mean values of the two explanatory variables.…”

Validation of MODIS C6 Dark Target Aerosol Products at 3 km and 10 km Spatial Resolutions Over the China Seas and the Eastern Indian Ocean

“…In this study, R is obtained from Deming Regression (DR) instead of that from Linear Regression (LR) because DR estimates an unbiased slope by assuming the Gaussian distribution of errors in both x and y data points (which is typical of our data) [61][62][63]. While LR estimates a biased slope by assuming random measurement errors in the dependent variable (y) and an error-free independent variable (x) [61,[64][65][66], but is inappropriate for use when significant errors are expected in both variables.…”

Analysis of Energy Input–Output of Farms and Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case Study of Cotton Growers

“…where, Y i is cotton yield of ith farmer, a and a j are the values of function (a is constant, while a j is derived through regression model) (coefficient of jth input), X ij is jth input of ith farmer, and the error term of ith farmer is u i , which is normally distributed with zero mean value and constant variance (Elahi et al, 2017). We assume that if X is 0, then Y is also 0 (Hatirli et al, 2005;Rafiee et al, 2010).…”