2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct computation of two-phase icosahedral equilibria of lipid bilayer vesicles

Abstract: Correctly formulated continuum models for lipid-bilayer membranes present a significant challenge to computational mechanics. In particular, the mid-surface behavior is that of a 2-dimensional fluid, while the membrane resists bending much like an elastic shell. Here we consider a well-known "Helfrich-Cahn-Hilliard" model for two-phase lipid-bilayer vesicles, incorporating mid-surface fluidity, curvature elasticity and a phase field. We present a systematic approach to the direct computation of vesical configu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some methods impose local area incompressibility (instead of global area constraint) [ 26 ] to suppress zero-energy modes, while others [ 25 , 39 ] dampen tangential motion by introducing ad hoc in-plane energies whose contributions are iteratively decreased to zero. Monge representation [ 29 ] or a radial graph ansatz [ 28 , 40 ]—where the surface is parametrized using a single unknown function—have also been used to circumvent reparametrization invariance. In this work, we employ the gauge-fixing procedure recently proposed in [ 27 ], which is computationally efficient for topologically spherical surfaces and does not require any iterative reduction in ad hoc energy terms that change the physics of the model.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some methods impose local area incompressibility (instead of global area constraint) [ 26 ] to suppress zero-energy modes, while others [ 25 , 39 ] dampen tangential motion by introducing ad hoc in-plane energies whose contributions are iteratively decreased to zero. Monge representation [ 29 ] or a radial graph ansatz [ 28 , 40 ]—where the surface is parametrized using a single unknown function—have also been used to circumvent reparametrization invariance. In this work, we employ the gauge-fixing procedure recently proposed in [ 27 ], which is computationally efficient for topologically spherical surfaces and does not require any iterative reduction in ad hoc energy terms that change the physics of the model.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied this framework to study interacting particles on a spherical fluid shell, employing a spectral Galerkin method and accordingly discretizing the surface deformation map using a spherical harmonic expansion. To circumvent computational issues stemming from the in-plane fluidity of the substrate [ 25 , 26 , 27 ], a radial graph ansatz [ 28 ] was implemented. According to this ansatz, the displacement is parametrized along the radial direction from the center of the reference sphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numerical methods continue to be used extensively in the study of phenomena in biomembranes, see, e.g. [67,4,37,38,2] and references therein. Similar geometric variational problems show up in other scientific areas.…”
Section:    (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, we can optimize in a symmetry preserving way by optimizing only over the degrees of freedom that determine the control mesh up to the desired symmetry, as is done in Brakke's Surface Evolver or [67]. This has the added advantage of reducing the dimensionality of the problem, but requires an extra effort in coding and algorithmic development.…”
Section: Comparison Ii: Symmetry Preservation Vs Symmetry Breakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter are useful, e.g., in understanding/visualizing symmetry-breaking behavior, for numerical bifurcation purposes, cf. [1], [4], [15], etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%