2015
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201500070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Detection of Static Dipolar Interaction on a Single Nanodisk Using Microfocused Brillouin Light Scattering Spectroscopy

Abstract: simulations by Dvornik et al. [ 30 ] Recently, Keatley et al. [ 31 ] used a time-resolved scanning Kerr microscopy to isolate the dynamic dipolar interaction between a pair of nominally-shaped disks. However, a detailed scrutiny of phase-resolved Kerr ellipticity data is required to determine the dynamic dipolar coupling strength versus edge-to-edge spacing/diameter ( s/d ) ratio. The effect of dipolar coupling was also found to be inadvertently enhanced due to their fabrication process.It is essential to perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16] In fact, interactions are the basis of a large number of nanoparticle-based magnetic materials, e.g., superferromagnets, superspin glasses, artificial spin ice, long range self-assemblies, or ferrofluids. 15,[17][18][19][20][21] Given the crucial importance of interactions in magnetic nanostructures, many direct and indirect approaches have been used to try to quantify them: first order reversal curve (FORC) analysis, 22,23 small angle neutron scattering, SANS, [24][25][26][27] electron holography, 28,29 magnetic force microscopy, 30,31 Lorentz microscopy, 32 Brillouin light scattering, 33 resonant magnetic x-ray scattering 34 and so on. However, one of the most accepted methods to assess interactions is the remanence plots technique (i.e., Henkel or δM plots), [35][36][37] which is routinely used to evaluate interactions between nanoparticles or grains [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16] In fact, interactions are the basis of a large number of nanoparticle-based magnetic materials, e.g., superferromagnets, superspin glasses, artificial spin ice, long range self-assemblies, or ferrofluids. 15,[17][18][19][20][21] Given the crucial importance of interactions in magnetic nanostructures, many direct and indirect approaches have been used to try to quantify them: first order reversal curve (FORC) analysis, 22,23 small angle neutron scattering, SANS, [24][25][26][27] electron holography, 28,29 magnetic force microscopy, 30,31 Lorentz microscopy, 32 Brillouin light scattering, 33 resonant magnetic x-ray scattering 34 and so on. However, one of the most accepted methods to assess interactions is the remanence plots technique (i.e., Henkel or δM plots), [35][36][37] which is routinely used to evaluate interactions between nanoparticles or grains [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exchange and dipolar interactions between grains or particles are essential to understanding the behavior of magnetic polycrystalline and colloidal materials. , Indeed, these interactions are key to the performance of many common magnetic materials, e.g., permanent magnets, , magnetic recording media, , and magnetically soft materials for high frequency applications, where dipolar interactions may have undesirable effects, such as aggregation of nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Magnetic interactions control the properties of sufficiently dense assemblies of magnetic nanoparticles and nanostructures, tailoring their functional properties, e.g., blocking (or freezing) temperature, coercivity, remanent magnetization, switching-field distribution, and effective anisotropy, among others. In fact, interactions are the basis of a large number of nanoparticle-based magnetic materials, e.g., superferromagnets, superspin glasses, artificial spin ice, long-range self-assemblies, or ferrofluids. , Given the crucial importance of interactions in magnetic nanostructures, many direct and indirect approaches have been used to try to quantify them: first-order reversal curve (FORC) analysis, , small angle neutron scattering, SANS, electron holography, , magnetic force microscopy, , Lorentz microscopy, Brillouin light scattering, resonant magnetic X-ray scattering, and so on. However, one of the most accepted methods to assess interactions is the remanence plots technique (i.e., Henkel or δM plots), which is routinely used to evaluate interactions between nanoparticles or grains both in fundamental studies , and in diverse nanopar...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inter-dot distance is fixed at 2-μm for all arrays. For such a large edge-to-edge distance, the dipolar interaction between the neighboring elements is negligible and thus can be ignored 20 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%