1988
DOI: 10.1016/0167-1987(88)90046-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct drilling and soil loosening for spring cereals on a fine sandy loam in Atlantic Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was not significantly affected by tillage in either of the crops. These findings agree with the results reported by Carter et al (1988) for spring barley under a cool, humid climate. The P content was 1.54, 1.72, and 1.84 mg g-1 in barley and 1.85, 2.04, and 2.18 mg g-1 in canola under CT, RT, and ZT, respectively; however, differences due to tillage were not significant.…”
Section: Barley Canotasupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was not significantly affected by tillage in either of the crops. These findings agree with the results reported by Carter et al (1988) for spring barley under a cool, humid climate. The P content was 1.54, 1.72, and 1.84 mg g-1 in barley and 1.85, 2.04, and 2.18 mg g-1 in canola under CT, RT, and ZT, respectively; however, differences due to tillage were not significant.…”
Section: Barley Canotasupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results suggest benefits in using RT compared with the other two systems, even though tillage effects on crop yield were nonsignificant in most cases. Cooler soil early in the growing season and reduced rates of nutrient mineralization (Nyborg and Malhi, 1989), and slower release of N from organic matter (Carter et al, 1988) in combination with relatively higher weed populations (Table 5), may have reduced crop yields under ZT in comparison with RT. Probably, part of the N mineralized after fall tillage was lost during snow melting, and the somewhat lower soil moisture during growing sea- SE T = 8.5; T x Y = 14.6 T = 4.9; T x Y = 7.0 t CT, conventional tillage; RT, reduced tillage; ZT, zero tillage.…”
Section: Barley Canotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, crop rotations with cereals followed by cereals are problematic. We also did not find an effect of tillage system on grain N content, similar to the findings of Ditsch and Grove [86] and contrary to those of Carter et al [87]. The lack of effect occurred at both studied N supply levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…9). This more pronounced aggregation increase does, however, not seem to lead to an [3,26,[30][31][32]35,38,59,65,77,79,109,111,113,114,139,164,172,173,177,194,Paustian and Elliott,unpublished,214,219,220,241] for (sub)tropical soils and from [2,11,22,42,50,[54][55][56]58,67,72,78,84,85,89,93,95,96,104,105,133,134,136,146,…”
Section: Mechanisms Of C Sequestration Under No-tillagementioning
confidence: 99%