1996
DOI: 10.1029/96gl01025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct‐driven mechanism for geomagnetic storms

Abstract: We have obtained the injection function for the part of the storm‐time depression which is related to the cross‐tail current and corresponding currents on the magnetopause. This injection function is QTC=−κU/S, where U is the electric potential difference between the dawn and dusk sides of the magnetosphere, S is the equatorial cross‐section of the stable trapping region, and κ is a coefficient varying from 0.5 to 1.5 depending on the state of the magnetosphere and solar wind pressure. The injection function Q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution to b(0) given by Eq. (48) is similar in form and value to previous estimates derived from various models of magnetotail currents (Alexeev et al, 1996;Arykov and Maltsev, 1996) or from empirical arguments Maltsev, 1998, 2000;Turner et al, 2000;Ohtani et al, 2001). As derived here, however, it does not depend on specific assumptions about current systems and is not affected by controversies (e.g.…”
Section: Magnetic Flux (Magnetotail) Integralsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The contribution to b(0) given by Eq. (48) is similar in form and value to previous estimates derived from various models of magnetotail currents (Alexeev et al, 1996;Arykov and Maltsev, 1996) or from empirical arguments Maltsev, 1998, 2000;Turner et al, 2000;Ohtani et al, 2001). As derived here, however, it does not depend on specific assumptions about current systems and is not affected by controversies (e.g.…”
Section: Magnetic Flux (Magnetotail) Integralsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…From a fit to observations, Burton et al [1975] determine Q as the function Q ′ given by with F the function defined by where α and the (small and mostly unimportant) offset cE 0 are constants. Their values as estimated most recently by McPherron and O'Brien [2001] are α = −4.65 nT hr −1 (mV m −1 ) −1 , cE 0 = 0.05 mV m −1 , given in commonly used units; only rarely [ Siscoe and Crooker , 1974; Arykov and Maltsev , 1996] is it pointed out that α is actually an inverse length, the value given above corresponding to (121 R E ) −1 . The rectifying function F ( x ) is the simplest mathematical representation of the dependence on the angle θ between the interplanetary magnetic field and the Earth's dipole moment; other, essentially equivalent representations, involving more complicated but smooth functions of θ, have been proposed (cf.…”
Section: Equations For Dst and (D/dt)dstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burton et al (1975) proposed a solar wind pressuredependent correction formula to remove the contribution of magnetopause currents to D st . Thirdly, Arykov and Maltsev (1996) pointed out that tail currents can dominate D st development during storms. For some moderate storms, Turner (2000) and Turner et al (2000) showed that the magnetotail currents accounted for $25% of D st and suggested that this contribution should be estimated for strong storms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%