2014
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Effects of Cattle on Grassland Birds in Canada

Abstract: Effects of grazing on grassland birds are generally thought to be indirect, through alteration of vegetation structure; however, livestock can also affect nest survival directly through trampling and other disturbances (e.g., livestock-induced abandonment). We extracted data on nest fates from 18 grazing studies conducted in Canada. We used these data to assess rates of nest destruction by cattle among 9 ecoregions and between seasonal and rotational grazing systems. Overall, few nests were destroyed by cattle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although benefits to breeding grassland birds have been suggested (McGauley 2004, OMAFRA 2012, empirical evidence of the effects of rotational grazing on Bobolink breeding success is limited. Bleho et al (2014) found that the risk of nest destruction from cattle was similar between continuous and rotational grazing for songbirds, ducks, and shorebirds in Canada. However, rotational grazing may provide management opportunities that benefit breeding grassland birds because cattle grazing is spatially and temporally controlled across paddocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although benefits to breeding grassland birds have been suggested (McGauley 2004, OMAFRA 2012, empirical evidence of the effects of rotational grazing on Bobolink breeding success is limited. Bleho et al (2014) found that the risk of nest destruction from cattle was similar between continuous and rotational grazing for songbirds, ducks, and shorebirds in Canada. However, rotational grazing may provide management opportunities that benefit breeding grassland birds because cattle grazing is spatially and temporally controlled across paddocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cattle can negatively affect nests by removing vegetation that provides cover for nests (potentially increasing predation) and by trampling (i.e., stepping or lying down on nests; Temple et al 1999, Renfrew et al 2005, Perlut and Strong 2011, MacDonald and Nol 2017. The proportion of nests affected by cattle is based on a combination of stocking density (i.e., the number of cattle per unit area) and the number of days a paddock is grazed (i.e., stocking rate, calculated as: number of cattle × days grazed/area grazed; Jensen et al 1990, Paine et al 1996, Bleho et al 2014, MacDonald and Nol 2017. In North Dakota, Kerns et al (2010) found that rotational grazing by cattle was not associated with Bobolink nest survival; 1 of 91 nests was trampled under typical stocking rates for the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High stocking densities on lowland grasslands also cause direct mortality of birds due to increased trampling of egg clutches and broods in nests (Vickery et al, 2001) although there is doubt whether similar effects are caused by free-range grazing herbivores, at lower stocking densities, in sub-montane ecosystems. It appears that grazers also have indirect effects on bird populations via a reduction in the availability of vegetation structures suitable for nest construction and concealment from predators, rather than direct mortality through nest trampling (Bleho et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have found small direct effects of nest destruction by cattle, but these effects were deemed unimportant in Canada (e.g. Bleho et al 2014). Simulations, as applied here, allowed us to directly assess projected population-level effects to fully understand relative implications of management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%