In nearly all papers concerning enzyme-nanoparticle based bioelectronic devices, it is stated that the presence of nanoparticles on electrode surfaces per se enhances bioelectrocatalysis, although the reasons for that enhancement are often unclear. Here, we report detailed experimental evidence that neither an overpotential of bioelectrocatalysis, nor direct electron transfer and bioelectrocatalytic reaction rates for an adsorbed enzyme depend on the size of nanoparticles within the range of 20-80 nm, i.e. for nanoparticles that are considerably larger than the enzyme molecules.Bioelectronics is a rapidly progressing interdisciplinary research eld 1 that aims to integrate biomaterials and electronic elements into functional devices which, among many other applications, can be used in high-tech, environmental, pharmaceutical and biomedical industries for sensing and power-generation purposes. High-performance direct electron transfer (DET)-based bioelectrocatalytic reactions at low overpotentials are needed to design sensitive, selective, and efficient third-generation (DET-based) bioelectronic devices, e.g. biosensors 2,3 and biofuel cells, 4,5 since third-generation bioelectronics are simple, non-toxic, and potentially miniaturisable down to nm scale. Nanostructuring electrode surfaces for enzyme-based bioelectronics is important because, in most cases, "planar" biodevices, i.e. designed without articial nanodecoration of electrodes, show very little or no electron transfer (ET) between immobilised redox enzymes and unmodied surfaces. The commonly offered explanation for "enzyme nanowiring" is an appropriate orientation of proteins on nanomaterials for ET reactions. Facile and effective bioelectrocatalysis has been shown in many papers, where different mono-and multi-centre redox enzymes, such as horseradish peroxidase, 6 glucose oxidase, 7-10 superoxide dismutase, 11 and cellobiose dehydrogenase, 12 with blue multicopper oxidases (MCOs), 13-18 respectively, are immobilised on different nanomaterials, e.g. metal and carbon nanoparticles (NPs) and nanotubes, graphene, nanoporous materials, etc. As a major proof for the enhancement of bioelectrocatalytic reactions, large bioelectrocatalytic currents that originate from nanostructured electrodes modied with oxidoreductases are usually presented. However, it should be emphasised that electrocatalysis is not actually related to the current increase, but should result in the decrease of an overpotential, which is quite rarely addressed in the case of bioelectrocatalytic reactions. Moreover, even for a particular enzyme, e.g. Trametes hirsuta laccase (ThLc), and a particular material, e.g. gold (Au), contradictory situations for different nanostructures can be found in the literature: the use of gold NPs (AuNPs) and nanoporous Au was shown to facilitate the DET-based bioelectrocatalytic reduction of oxygen (O 2 ), 13,18 whereas Aumodied nano-/microstructured silicon chips with the immobilised enzyme displayed very limited DET-based activity.
19Furthermore, two op...