2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.172398899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct evidence that sulfhydryl groups of Keap1 are the sensors regulating induction of phase 2 enzymes that protect against carcinogens and oxidants

Abstract: Coordinate induction of phase 2 proteins and elevation of glutathione protect cells against the toxic and carcinogenic effects of electrophiles and oxidants. All inducers react covalently with thiols at rates that are closely related to their potencies. Inducers disrupt the cytoplasmic complex between the actin-bound protein Keap1 and the transcription factor Nrf2, thereby releasing Nrf2 to migrate to the nucleus where it activates the antioxidant response element (ARE) of phase 2 genes and accelerates their t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

34
1,381
2
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,738 publications
(1,424 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
34
1,381
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative hypothesis of Nrf2 liberation, modification of Keap1, proposes that some reactive -SH groups on Keap1 act as oxidative stress sensors and that modification of them by ROS or electrophiles disrupts the Nrf2-Keap1 complex leading to Nrf2 dissociation. This hypothesis is supported by evidence of continuous Nrf2 activation by mutation of the active cysteine residues of Keap1 [67,70,71] and by the finding of conjugate formation between the electrophiles and the thiol group in Keap1 [72]. It seems that in the case of Nrf2 activation by HNE, Keap1 modification may be involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative hypothesis of Nrf2 liberation, modification of Keap1, proposes that some reactive -SH groups on Keap1 act as oxidative stress sensors and that modification of them by ROS or electrophiles disrupts the Nrf2-Keap1 complex leading to Nrf2 dissociation. This hypothesis is supported by evidence of continuous Nrf2 activation by mutation of the active cysteine residues of Keap1 [67,70,71] and by the finding of conjugate formation between the electrophiles and the thiol group in Keap1 [72]. It seems that in the case of Nrf2 activation by HNE, Keap1 modification may be involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It is then translocated to the nucleus to form heterodimers with other leucine zipper proteins such as c-Jun and small Mafs. These complexes transactivate gene expression by binding to EpRE [65][66][67]. Two mechanisms have been proposed for Nrf2-Keap1 dissociation, i.e., Nrf2 phosphorylation and Keap1 modification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nrf2 activation is prevented by binding to KEAP-1. Oxidative insults target KEAP-1 by targeting cysteines 273 and 288, which cause dissociation of KEAP-1 from Nrf2, allowing accumulation of Nrf2 in the nucleus and activation of target genes [174,175]. Investigations into the mechanisms whereby KEAP-1 promotes degradation of Nrf2 have unraveled that KEAP-1 acts as a redox sensitive adaptor for a Cul3-based E3 ligase [176].…”
Section: Regulation Of Molecular Adaptors and Chaperonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different mechanisms of Nrf2 activation have been proposed and shown to vary with different activators. According to one pathway, Keap1 appears to interact with Nrf2 activators such as phenolic antioxidants through its thio-groups, leading to the stabilization of the Nrf2 protein [17]. Whereas the phenolic antioxidant tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ) may stabilize Nrf2 by inhibiting its degradation via the Keap1-dependent E3 without disrupting the Nrf2/Keap1/Cul3 complex, toxic metals such as arsenic (As) and chromium (Cr(VI)) increase the half-life of the Nrf2 protein as well as dissociate Nrf2 from Keap1 and Cul3 in the nucleus [10,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%