2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-012-1005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct evidence that the N-terminal extensions of the TAP complex act as autonomous interaction scaffolds for the assembly of the MHC I peptide-loading complex

Abstract: The loading of antigenic peptides onto major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) molecules is an essential step in the adaptive immune response against virally or malignantly transformed cells. The ER-resident peptide-loading complex (PLC) consists of the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP1 and TAP2), assembled with the auxiliary factors tapasin and MHC I. Here, we demonstrated that the N-terminal extension of each TAP subunit represents an autonomous domain, named TMD0, which is correc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even more interesting, when using a TAP-specific Ab for IP, equal amounts of tpn and TPSN Ex3 were co-precipitated. Since our HLA-B*44:02 stability analysis never showed a complete loss in the presence of TPSN Ex3, the data indicate, that more than one active MHC-I loading site per TAP molecule exist, which has recently been proposed also by others [15,16]. Furthermore, since TPSN Ex3 was not able to displace tpn completely from the TAP complex, it suggests, in a functional sense, that there are at least two differing binding sites for tpn on TAP, which has been observed previously for rat TAP subunits [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even more interesting, when using a TAP-specific Ab for IP, equal amounts of tpn and TPSN Ex3 were co-precipitated. Since our HLA-B*44:02 stability analysis never showed a complete loss in the presence of TPSN Ex3, the data indicate, that more than one active MHC-I loading site per TAP molecule exist, which has recently been proposed also by others [15,16]. Furthermore, since TPSN Ex3 was not able to displace tpn completely from the TAP complex, it suggests, in a functional sense, that there are at least two differing binding sites for tpn on TAP, which has been observed previously for rat TAP subunits [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It has been shown that both TAP1 and TAP2 subunits possess binding sites for tpn at their N-terminal TMSs [10][11][12]. The exact stoichiometry of the PLC has been a matter of debate [13,14]; however, recent findings demonstrate a TAP-tpn ratio of 1:2 [15,16] as proposed previously also by Rufer et al [17].In addition to connecting the components of the PLC, tpn is crucial for the optimal loading and selection of peptide ligands onto . In the process of peptide editing, a stable disulfide bond formed between tpn (Cys-95) and the oxidoreductase ERp57 (Cys-57) has been suggested to play an important role [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…8B, all three TAP2 mutants co-isolated less TPN per immunoprecipitated TAP2 when compared with TAP2wt (i.e., the TAP2/TPN ratio increased from 1.0 to values of 1.3-1.5). This suggests that the central TM leucine residues L20 (TM1) and L66 (TM2) are indeed relevant for proper stoichiometric complex formation between TAP2 and TPN (7,15). Although the observed TPN-binding differences between wt and TAP2 mutants are small, we could replicate this interesting result by performing quantitative immunodepletion experiments (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Although both N-domains of TAP independently contribute to MHC I/TPN binding, various studies have provided strong evidence for a functional asymmetry with greater significance of the TAP2/TPN interaction for PLC function (7,15). In line with this, only one TPN bound to TAP2 is sufficient for functional PLC assembly, efficient quality control, and stable peptide loading (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation