2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct identification of flutter derivatives and aerodynamic admittances of bridge decks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These research results have been adopted into the related China Codes [23,56]. Gu and Qin [57] and Qin and Gu [58] were the first researchers to introduce stochastic sub-space identification method into identification of aerodynamic parameters including aerodynamic stiffness and damping of long-span bridges, obtaining satisfying results. Compared with random decrement method, the stochastic sub-space identification method has more merits than RDT and MRDT and can overcome their main shortcomings i.e., weak noise-resistantce ability and need for large experimental data.…”
Section: Across-wind Aerodynamic Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These research results have been adopted into the related China Codes [23,56]. Gu and Qin [57] and Qin and Gu [58] were the first researchers to introduce stochastic sub-space identification method into identification of aerodynamic parameters including aerodynamic stiffness and damping of long-span bridges, obtaining satisfying results. Compared with random decrement method, the stochastic sub-space identification method has more merits than RDT and MRDT and can overcome their main shortcomings i.e., weak noise-resistantce ability and need for large experimental data.…”
Section: Across-wind Aerodynamic Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gu et al [8,9] ameliorated Sarker's theory so that it is possible for the derivatives' overall resolution in 2000. For the random process of turbulent excitations, Gu and Qin [10] stated a method called stochastic subspace algorithm. The related researches [11,12] show that the influence of turbulent flow is less dangerous than the smooth flow since the smooth form usually leads to a sudden structural collapse and the turbulent form can be approximated as a random disturbance, which is not relevant to the parameters of bridge structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the solution is searched in the form of (5), (4) yields (6). In (6) the L matrix can be written by using the Starossek notation [2], see equations (7) and (8). Finally the (8) linear eigenvalue problem is to be solved (U red = U/(B · f ), reduced velocity).…”
Section: Calculation Of the Critical Wind Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, with a strong computational background, CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulations appear to be powerful rivals of the wind tunnel tests [2,4,6,8]. Recently a number of numerical simulations have been made in order to assess the aeroelastic behaviour of bridge structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%