Direct Ink Writing of Mineral Materials: A review

Liu, Hao; Tang, Danna; Sun, Tao; Feng, Zuying; Evans, K. E.; Li, Yan

doi:10.1007/s40684-020-00222-6

Cited by 34 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 157 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In Table 2, the printed dimensions (width, length, and thickness) of the scaffolds were smaller than the CAD theoretical values. Previous studies 35,36 also show similar results and reflected the shrinkage issue of the DIW printed scaffolds. With the increase in HAp concentration, the difference between the theoretical values and experimental values in terms of width, length, and thickness gradually decreased.…”

Section: Effect Of Operational Parameterssupporting

confidence: 76%

“…29,30 The physics of resin under pressure is similar to the seepage pr lar approaches have been used also to mod into a mold containing fiber mats. 23,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] T in these cases to determine the resin flow ing times corresponding to different infilt Preceramic polycarbosilane polymers as precursors to make ceramic fibers 10,3 trix. [7][8][9]40,41 The chemical and volume ch pany ceramization of the polymer during documented in several studies.…”

Section: Micro-ct Scan Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…29,30 The physics of resin flow into a mold under pressure is similar to the seepage problem and so similar approaches have been used also to model the flow of resin into a mold containing fiber mats. 23,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] The models are used in these cases to determine the resin flow front and mold filling times corresponding to different infiltration conditions.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Direct ink writing of vancomycin‐loaded polycaprolactone/ polyethylene oxide/ hydroxyapatite 3D scaffolds

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The repair of bone defects is an important focus area in orthopedic surgery; the current surgical treatments depending on the lesion size and severity include microfracture, autograft, allograft, and total joint replacement. 1,2 However, those treatments have drawbacks, including the quality inconsistency of the tissue obtained from microfracture, 3 limitations in the autograft supply, immune rejection of allograft tissue, 4,5 as well as wear and loosening of prostheses. 2 Bone tissue engineering therapies are attractive due to their potential to create biological substitutes that can maintain, replace, or regenerate bone tissue. 1,6 Ideally, a bone scaffold should closely mimic the physiological properties of natural bone tissue; for example, a tissue scaffold should possess mechanical properties that match the host tissue as well as appropriate porosity and interconnectivity for nutrient delivery and tissue regeneration. 7,8 Particularly, bone scaffolds with pores larger than 300 µm facilitate the penetration of mineralized tissue and cell migration toward the scaffold center, stimulating nutrient supply and waste product removal. 6,9 In addition, the main chemical components

show abstract

Section: Effect Of Operational Parameterssupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Micro-ct Scan Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Direct ink writing of vancomycin‐loaded polycaprolactone/ polyethylene oxide/ hydroxyapatite 3D scaffolds

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nanoparticles dis persed in viscous plastic melts or highly concentrated solutions can facilitate the formation of liquid crystalline phases due to particle selfassembly driven by the Brownian movement (Figure 8h,i). [22,84,277,[312][313][314][315][316][317][318][319][320][321] In the absence of flow, particles are locally aligned within liquid crystal domains, but the different orientation of individual domains leads to the global random distribution of particle orientations. These domains will reor ganize under shear flow and determine the final microstruc tures during extrusion processing.…”

Section: Fdm Extrusion-induced Alignmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

3D Printing‐Enabled Nanoparticle Alignment: A Review of Mechanisms and Applications

Jambhulkar

Ravichandran

et al. 2021

Small

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3D printing (additive manufacturing (AM)) has enormous potential for rapid tooling and mass production due to its design flexibility and significant reduction of the timeline from design to manufacturing. The current state-of-the-art in 3D printing focuses on material manufacturability and engineering applications. However, there still exists the bottleneck of low printing resolution and processing rates, especially when nanomaterials need tailorable orders at different scales. An interesting phenomenon is the preferential alignment of nanoparticles that enhance material properties. Therefore, this review emphasizes the landscape of nanoparticle alignment in the context of 3D printing. Herein, a brief overview of 3D printing is provided, followed by a comprehensive summary of the 3D printing-enabled nanoparticle alignment in wellestablished and in-house customized 3D printing mechanisms that can lead to selective deposition and preferential orientation of nanoparticles. Subsequently, it is listed that typical applications that utilized the properties of ordered nanoparticles (e.g., structural composites, heat conductors, chemo-resistive sensors, engineered surfaces, tissue scaffolds, and actuators based on structural and functional property improvement). This review's emphasis is on the particle alignment methodology and the performance of composites incorporating aligned nanoparticles. In the end, significant limitations of current 3D printing techniques are identified together with future perspectives.

show abstract

“…After deposition, the ink is immediately cured into a solid object by different post-processes, such as photopolymerization or thermal curing [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. Similar to FDM, DIW is also a high-efficiency method to deposit multi-material printed parts because it is of low cost and can be simply carried out [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. More importantly, DIW exhibits tremendous potential because it is highly suitable for printing a large variety of different functional materials through multiple inkjet heads or nozzles to deposit different materials, including metallic particles [ 99 , 100 , 101 ], ceramic particles [ 102 , 103 , 104 ], extracellular matrices [ 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 ], hydrogels, and elastomers and epoxy thermosets [ 109 , 110 , 111 112 ].…”

Section: Systematic Review Of Current Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing of Polymers

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers has experienced a remarkable increase in interest over the last 20 years. This technology can rapidly design and directly fabricate three-dimensional (3D) parts with multiple materials without complicating manufacturing processes. This research aims to obtain a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the current state of research and reveal challenges and opportunities for future research in the area. To achieve the goal, this study conducts a scientometric analysis and a systematic review of the global research published from 2000 to 2021 on multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers. In the scientometric analysis, a total of 2512 journal papers from the Scopus database were analyzed by evaluating the number of publications, literature coupling, keyword co-occurrence, authorship, and countries/regions activities. By doing so, the main research frame, articles, and topics of this research field were quantitatively determined. Subsequently, an in-depth systematic review is proposed to provide insight into recent advances in multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers in the aspect of technologies and applications, respectively. From the scientometric analysis, a heavy bias was found towards studying materials in this field but also a lack of focus on developing technologies. The future trend is proposed by the systematic review and is discussed in the directions of interfacial bonding strength, printing efficiency, and microscale/nanoscale multi-material 3D printing. This study contributes by providing knowledge for practitioners and researchers to understand the state of the art of multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers and expose its research needs, which can serve both academia and industry.

show abstract

Direct Ink Writing of Mineral Materials: A review

Cited by 34 publications

References 157 publications

Direct ink writing of vancomycin‐loaded polycaprolactone/ polyethylene oxide/ hydroxyapatite 3D scaffolds

Direct ink writing of vancomycin‐loaded polycaprolactone/ polyethylene oxide/ hydroxyapatite 3D scaffolds

3D Printing‐Enabled Nanoparticle Alignment: A Review of Mechanisms and Applications

Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing of Polymers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About