1991
DOI: 10.1177/001440299105700605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Instruction in Math Word Problems: Students with Learning Disabilities

Abstract: This investigation was conducted to test the effectiveness of strategy teaching and sequencing practice problems in teaching students with learning disabilities to identify the correct algorithm for solving addition and subtraction word problems. Sixty-two students were assigned to one of three experimental groups: strategy plus sequence, strategy only, and sequence only. The results indicated that students in the strategy-plus-sequence group, as well as those in the strategy-only group, scored significantly h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing a direct instruction intervention for computation, Van Houten and Rolider (1990) taught students to match a numeral to a specific color to teach number names, with two thirds of the subjects tested demonstrating 100% accuracy 4 months posttest. In another direct instruction intervention for problem solving, Wilson and Sindelar (1991) successfully taught addition and subtraction word problems to students with learning disabilities. Students receiving this direct instruction performed significantly better than the control group.…”
Section: Instructional Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing a direct instruction intervention for computation, Van Houten and Rolider (1990) taught students to match a numeral to a specific color to teach number names, with two thirds of the subjects tested demonstrating 100% accuracy 4 months posttest. In another direct instruction intervention for problem solving, Wilson and Sindelar (1991) successfully taught addition and subtraction word problems to students with learning disabilities. Students receiving this direct instruction performed significantly better than the control group.…”
Section: Instructional Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a single-case study with one student, Waugh and Harrison (2014) reported that the student performed at the 33rd percentile on the Broad Reading composite of the Woodcock-Johnson III, yet the authors did not explain whether this reading performance would be considered RD. C. L. Wilson and Sindelar (1991) stated all students in their study demonstrated a reading level of at least grade 1.5 (i.e., half way through first grade) with no further information.…”
Section: Rdmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Gains were maintained at 6and 8week mastery checks. Wilson and Sindelar (1991) investigated the use of direct instruction for teaching addition and subtraction word problems to 62 elementary students with learning disabilities. The study had three comparison groups: .…”
Section: Use Of Strategy Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%