2017
DOI: 10.17161/fec.v31i1.6763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validated Practices for Teaching Mathematics to Students With Learning Disabilities: A Review of Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kroesbergen& Van Luit, 2003;Miller, Butler, & Lee, 1998) difficulties, learning becomes successful. The sequential use of manipulative devices and pictorial representations helps students to develop conceptual knowledge and promotes students' problem solving skills in mathematics (Witzelet al, 2008;Kroesbergen & Van Luit, 2003).…”
Section: Concrete Representational Abstract Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kroesbergen& Van Luit, 2003;Miller, Butler, & Lee, 1998) difficulties, learning becomes successful. The sequential use of manipulative devices and pictorial representations helps students to develop conceptual knowledge and promotes students' problem solving skills in mathematics (Witzelet al, 2008;Kroesbergen & Van Luit, 2003).…”
Section: Concrete Representational Abstract Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dennis et al (2016) replicates the results, at least partly, in previous meta-analysis concerning group-based interventions for children with mathematical learning difficulties (Baker, Gersten & Lee, 2002;Swanson et al 1999). These studies show that intervention studies that used explicit and strategic instructional procedures with students with learning difficulties have been found to have larger effect sizes compared to other instructional approaches (Baker et al, 2002;Chodura & al., 2015;Gersten et al, 2009;Kroesbergen & Van Luit, 2003;Miller et al, 1998;Swanson et al, 1999). Explicit interventions included for instance sequencing of instruction in to logical sequences, providing clear presentation of subject matter, guided practice, independent practice and evaluating student learning on a regular basis.…”
Section: The Features Of Effective Instruction For Children With Mathematical Learning Difficultiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicit interventions included for instance sequencing of instruction in to logical sequences, providing clear presentation of subject matter, guided practice, independent practice and evaluating student learning on a regular basis. Explicit instruction often includes using Concrete-representationalabstract (CRA) sequence which have been found be effective instructional feature Miller et al, 1998;Xin & Jitendra, 1998). Peer-assisted instruction has been found to be effective instructional feature with younger students (Baker et al, 2002;Kunsch et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Features Of Effective Instruction For Children With Mathematical Learning Difficultiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, recent research suggests that students with learning disabilities suffer from difficulties not only in literacy, but in mathematics as well (Hanich, Jordan, Kaplan and Dick, 2001). Approximately 25% of the students with learning disabilities were reported to have difficulties in acquiring the mathematics abilities (Miller, Butler and Lee, 1998;Rivera, 1997). Students having difficulties in learning mathematics are described under the term mathematics learning disabilities.…”
Section: Extended Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%