2011
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.331
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct interaction of PU.1 with oncogenic transcription factors reduces its serine phosphorylation and promoter binding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D ). Given recent findings implicating Pu.1 phosphorylation in the transcriptional activation of terminal myeloid‐specific gene programs, we postulate this to be a previously unrecognized mechanism by which Nf1 haploinsufficiency engenders myeloid lineage commitment, thereby promoting osteoclastogenesis and hyperresorptive activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D ). Given recent findings implicating Pu.1 phosphorylation in the transcriptional activation of terminal myeloid‐specific gene programs, we postulate this to be a previously unrecognized mechanism by which Nf1 haploinsufficiency engenders myeloid lineage commitment, thereby promoting osteoclastogenesis and hyperresorptive activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In fact, recent studies suggest that phosphorylation of Pu.1 plays a central role in modulating its DNA binding affinity, (37,46) and is thereby critical to its ability to activate myeloid-specific gene programs that promote terminal differentiation. (39,40) For instance, although human myeloid leukemic cell lines have been shown to overexpress Pu.1, (47) the transcript levels of Pu.1-dependent myeloid genes, such as CD11b and c-fms, are relatively low by comparison. (48,49) Carey and colleagues (37) showed that this discrepancy between Pu.1 expression level and transcriptional activity depends on the phosphorylation status of Pu.1, whereby Pu.1 phosphorylation induced by tetradecanoylphorbol-13 acetate (TPA) led to growth arrest in leukemic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, restoring sufficient levels of PU.1 functional protein can partially overcome the maturation arrest mediated by the PML/RARA and PLZF/RARA fusion proteins [36]. Of note, PU.1 overexpression does not per se interfere with LICs and does not cure the disease [17]. Factors that induce transcriptional activation in PML/RARA-transformed cells suffice just to initiate differentiation, whereas only a profound and long-lasting deprivation of PML/RARA function causes the loss of clonogenic activity, dissociating simple maturation of still leukemogenic blasts from true eradication of LICs [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the myeloid compartment, PU.1, an ETS transcription factor known to regulate myeloid differentiation, has a well-established role in leukemia suppression [16, 17]. Silencing of PU.1 in the adult hematopoietic tissue produces dysfunctional stem cells and impairs granulopoiesis, by inducing a maturation block [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, altered PU.1 function is possibly involved in leukemogenesis, as the PU.1 gene mutation has been described in certain patients with AML (10). Furthermore, certain oncogenic fusion proteins, such as AML1-eight twenty-one and promyelocytic leukemia-retinoic acid receptor α, are also associated PU.1 affects proliferation of the human acute myeloid leukemia U937 cell line by directly regulating MEIS1 with PU.1 inhibition (11)(12)(13)(14). Thus, as a tumor suppressor, PU.1 expression facilitates commitment to myeloid differentiation and its downregulation may be crucial in the pathogenesis of AML.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%