2016
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-58392016000100015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct measurement and prediction of bulk density on alluvial soils of central Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that general PTFs yield poor results when applied in different pedogenetic environments. Casanova et al () compared laboratory measured bulk density from alluvial soils from Chile with the predictions of 10 published PTFs and highlighted the need to develop local models. Nanko et al () reported similar results for forest soils in Japan.…”
Section: Methodological Challenges For Ptf Use In Earth System Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that general PTFs yield poor results when applied in different pedogenetic environments. Casanova et al () compared laboratory measured bulk density from alluvial soils from Chile with the predictions of 10 published PTFs and highlighted the need to develop local models. Nanko et al () reported similar results for forest soils in Japan.…”
Section: Methodological Challenges For Ptf Use In Earth System Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil organic carbon was determined by the potassium dichromate wet oxidation method (Nelson & Sommers, 1982); total nitrogen (N) by the Kjeldahl distillation method (Jones, 2001) following digestion with concentrated H 2 SO 4 ; available phosphorus (P) by the Bray 1 method (Jones, 2001); and exchangeable potassium (K) using the 1 M ammonium acetate method (Chapman, 1965). The particle size distribution was determined using the hydrometer method (Jones, 2001) while the bulk density was determined using the core ring method (Casanova, Tapia, Seguel & Salazar, 2016).…”
Section: Characterization Of Soils and Organic Inputs Used In The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verification of the proposed method, from the point of view of assessing the values of grouping parameters and variables of the regression model, may be difficult due to the measurement methods used in this work and the conditions for making measurements. The soil bulk density determination was performed using the core sampling method (volumetric cylinder method), which is the most common method used to determine bulk density agricultural soils [35]. Researchers use cylinders of different sizes, which may be affected by the result of the soil properties determined [36][37][38].…”
Section: Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%