2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1785-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct medical costs attributable to peripheral fractures in Canadian post-menopausal women

Abstract: The treatment of hip fractures accounts for a significant proportion of the costs associated with the treatment of peripheral osteoporotic fractures. Interventions to reduce the incidence of fractures, particularly hip fractures, would result in significant cost savings to the health care system and would preserve quality of life in many patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Another strength of our national analysis is that were able to verify our estimates with different data within Canada, from three other independent research bodies: the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (MCHP) [20], the Recognizing Osteoporosis and its Consequences in Quebec (ROCQ) [16], and the prospective Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) [21]. As verification, our estimate of the cost of physician claims was similar to ROCQ [22] and MCHP [9] and the percentage use of home care and LTC was similar between our national estimate and the estimates from MCHP [9] and CaMOS [11]. The percentage use of LTC after a fracture is also consistent with other studies [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Another strength of our national analysis is that were able to verify our estimates with different data within Canada, from three other independent research bodies: the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (MCHP) [20], the Recognizing Osteoporosis and its Consequences in Quebec (ROCQ) [16], and the prospective Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) [21]. As verification, our estimate of the cost of physician claims was similar to ROCQ [22] and MCHP [9] and the percentage use of home care and LTC was similar between our national estimate and the estimates from MCHP [9] and CaMOS [11]. The percentage use of LTC after a fracture is also consistent with other studies [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Of note, Australian cost estimates per HF patient appear to be consistent with international reports, which considered hospitalization costs between $US 8,358 and $US 32,195 140 and average cost in the first year following a HF Canadian $46,664. 147 The reported results and projections highlight the need of strategies to prevent post-stroke HF 148 and may have a potential of contributing to healthcare planning and resourcing for the elderly, in whom both HF and stroke remain major public health problems.…”
Section: 54mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Taking the same methodological approach, our earlier work estimated the average cost of treating acute fractures and postfracture complications in the year after fracture to be $46,664 (Canadian dollars [CND]) per hip/femur fracture, $5253 for wrist fracture and $10,410 for fractures of other peripheral sites. (15) Major strengths of this study included the use of populationbased administrative databases, providing global measurement of healthcare delivery at the population level and access to a large sample of fracture cases for each fracture site, allowing robust estimation. Moreover, in selecting only medical claims and hospitalizations for fracture care, medical resource utilization directly attributable to fracture care and representing actual utilization of care was assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although the burden of osteoporosis-related fractures is high in terms of excess mortality, (8,12) levels of healthcare used, (29) institutionalization, (33) and their associated costs, (15) under-recognition of osteoporosis and its consequences remains problematic (4) despite the availability of effective therapy to reduce fracture risk. Therefore, effective public health interventions need to be introduced to improve the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis, particularly in highrisk groups (ie, those with fragility fracture) to reduce their impact on the healthcare system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%