1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(99)01117-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct, preparative enantioselective chromatography of propranolol hydrochloride and thioridazine hydrochloride using carbon dioxide-based mobile phases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Enantioselective separation of each of the target analytes was first attempted in the absence of any additive to establish analyte retention and observe chromatographic peak shape. Additives were then incorporated into the methanol modifier at various levels and the effects on retention, enantioselectivity, and resolution were monitored.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Enantioselective separation of each of the target analytes was first attempted in the absence of any additive to establish analyte retention and observe chromatographic peak shape. Additives were then incorporated into the methanol modifier at various levels and the effects on retention, enantioselectivity, and resolution were monitored.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the methods, voltammetry [8][9][10] and conventional high performance liquid chromatography 11,12 are most often used. Supercritical fluid chromatography 13 and HPLC combined with other techniques [14][15][16][17][18] were reported for determination of TRH and its main metabolites or derivatives. Chemiluminescence 19 , electrophoresis 20 , spectrofluorimetric 21,22 and spectrophotometry [23][24][25][26] have been also reported for the determination of thioridazine hydrochloride.…”
Section: Chemicals and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…column were 40 mg and 32 mg for propranolol HCl and thioridazine HCl, respectively, and the enantiomeric excess was better than 99.2% and 98.2%, respectively. 127 The most often used preparative chromatographic enantioseparation is simulated moving bed technology applied for such drugs as tramadol (productivity, with a feed concentration of 20 g/l, at a feed flow- 128 guaifenesin (on Chiralcel OD, productivity, 80.6 g/day/kg chiral stationary phase) 129,130 and others (formoterol, aminoglutethimide) 129,131 or for some pharmaceutical intermediates (ester of quinoline mevalonic acid). 132,133 A similar method, called closed-loop steady state recycling, was also used for that purpose.…”
Section: à125mentioning
confidence: 99%