2005
DOI: 10.1021/jp0542726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Quantification of Intraparticle Protein Diffusion in Chromatographic Media

Abstract: Diffusion coefficients of proteins in chromatographic media are important parameters for the rational design of stationary phases and purification schemes. In contrast to free diffusion, intraparticle diffusion is hindered by the porous structure of the media. Direct intraparticle diffusion analysis (IDA) is a novel approach for the determination of intraparticle protein diffusion coefficients. IDA is based on the evaluation of spatially and temporally resolved intraparticle concentration profiles. To prevent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If that can be done at the microfluidic level it would ease this. Also at very small scale, studies of intraparticle protein diffusion and uptake in micro-columns using confocal laser scanning microscopy have allowed data to be collected at a very small scale which agree with values obtained at large scales (Dziennik et al, 2005;Schroder et al, 2006). Siu et al (2007) showed that this approach could be used to assess fouling and that the miniature column format, bed volume 66 mL with flow through, was better for prediction than a batch test.…”
Section: Microwell-based Studiessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…If that can be done at the microfluidic level it would ease this. Also at very small scale, studies of intraparticle protein diffusion and uptake in micro-columns using confocal laser scanning microscopy have allowed data to be collected at a very small scale which agree with values obtained at large scales (Dziennik et al, 2005;Schroder et al, 2006). Siu et al (2007) showed that this approach could be used to assess fouling and that the miniature column format, bed volume 66 mL with flow through, was better for prediction than a batch test.…”
Section: Microwell-based Studiessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Finally, the diffusion coefficients used in this study were taken from literature (Dziennik et al, 2003;Coffman et al, 1997;Cussler, 1997). In a recent study Schröder et al (2006) determined the diffusion coefficient for lysozyme labeled with Cy5 in Sepharose 6 FF to 6.07 Â 10 À7 cm 2 /s which is slightly higher than assumed in this study. The influence of this should, however, be negligible within the scope of his study.…”
Section: Sma Parameter Of Bio-conjugatesmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In the calculation, we assumed that the external concentration of labeled and native protein was an ideal step function as the experiment begins. The experimental studies, however, were conducted in a packed bed and the protein concentration at the surface of the observed particle is not a perfect step (Schröder et al, 2006) and the labeled and native concentration changes may not occur simultaneously due to the separation occurring in the bed. The incorrect prediction that the overshoot magnitude at 6 mM ionic strength is greater than at 50 mM ionic strength are at least partly due to neglecting the kinetics of adsorption and desorption of the protein.…”
Section: Model Prediction Versus Clsm Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immobilization is the net result of various conformational changes that occur within and outside the enzyme surface. Immobilization could cause altered enzyme activity (Schröder et al, 2006). The formation of individual biomolecules and their orientation on surfaces can easily be monitored by different microscopic and spectroscopic techniques.…”
Section: Recent Tools and Technique For Structural Determination Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%