2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10535-012-0127-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct shoot regeneration from Arabidopsis thaliana shoot apical meristems

Abstract: In Arabidopsis thaliana in vitro culture, shoots were induced from the shoot apical meristem (SAM) of germinating seeds in the presence of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Primary shoot primordia developed leaf-like structures, from which secondary shoot primordia were produced. Regenerated shoots were recovered when the material was transferred to a medium lacking auxin. Adventitious roots formed from a callusing basal region of the secondary shoots. The CUC1 transcription factor was expressed at the apex of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also examined the epigenetic mutants fwa-1 and fwa-2, which have reduced DNA methylation in the FWA promoter and show higher expression of FWA compared to the WT (Koornneef et al, 1991). Using our previously described culture system for direct in vitro shoot regeneration (Xin et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2013), we detected no differences between acc1-1, max3-9, tfl1-1, and grp3 and the WT after 14 d in vitro (Figure S5). After 7 d of culture, smooth-surfaced protuberances were produced from the SAMs of the explants, but slightly fewer fwa-1 and fwa-2 explants developed such protuberances compared to WT explants (Figure 3A-D).…”
Section: Figure 2 Continuedmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also examined the epigenetic mutants fwa-1 and fwa-2, which have reduced DNA methylation in the FWA promoter and show higher expression of FWA compared to the WT (Koornneef et al, 1991). Using our previously described culture system for direct in vitro shoot regeneration (Xin et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2013), we detected no differences between acc1-1, max3-9, tfl1-1, and grp3 and the WT after 14 d in vitro (Figure S5). After 7 d of culture, smooth-surfaced protuberances were produced from the SAMs of the explants, but slightly fewer fwa-1 and fwa-2 explants developed such protuberances compared to WT explants (Figure 3A-D).…”
Section: Figure 2 Continuedmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…T he ability to regenerate shoots or roots from in vitrocultured explants is a property shared by most plant species (Che et al, 2007;Ikeuchi et al, 2019;Lardon et al, 2020). In Arabidopsis thaliana, shoot regeneration can be induced directly or indirectly (Che et al, 2007;Xin et al, 2012). In indirect shoot regeneration, the explant is cultured…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was reported that t-butanol is equivalent or sometimes superior to CPD (Inoué and Osatake, 1988;Baskin et al, 2014). The t-butanol freeze-drying method is commonly used to prepare biological SEM samples in Japan (Kaneko et al, 1990;Tuji, 2000;Watanabe et al, 2015), China (Xin et al, 2012), and other regions (El Sharaby et al, 2012). Methanol is reported to be a better fixative than glutaraldehyde and FAA when preparing SEM samples (Neinhuis and Edelmann, 1996;Pathan et al, 2010;Talbot and White, 2013b).…”
Section: Conventional Sem T-butanol Freeze-drying Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%