2005
DOI: 10.2514/1.12532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Simulations of Hypersonic Flows With Shock Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
7
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 shows a comparison of both simulation variants with pressure measurements for the 50 km-condition. In accordance with the observation of Moss and Bird [3], the choice of α v has no impact on pressure-both simulations agree well with the measurements. When comparing the simulations to measurements of heat flux at the same condition, however, differences show up, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4 shows a comparison of both simulation variants with pressure measurements for the 50 km-condition. In accordance with the observation of Moss and Bird [3], the choice of α v has no impact on pressure-both simulations agree well with the measurements. When comparing the simulations to measurements of heat flux at the same condition, however, differences show up, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The extra energy stored in the vibrational mode results in a flow condition different to an atmospheric flight test, and could lead to increased surface heat flux in case the molecules transfer vibrational energy during surface collisions. The issue has been addressed several times, however with vastly different assumptions and conclusions for the vibrational energy accommodation at the wall, ranging form nearly full accommodation [3] to hardly any, i.e. a vibrationally inert or non-catalytic surface [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although profiles of shear stress are not shown here (and were not measured experimentally), the point of separation x sep predicted by MONACO for each sampling interval is listed in Table 1. By noting the percentage change in x sep per millisecond, it is evident that the size of the separation region has effectively reached steady state after 1.5 ms. DSMC simulations of the same case performed by Moss and Bird [29] draw the same conclusion and predict a level of agreement with experimental data similar to the MONACO results in Fig. 2b.…”
Section: Full Navier-stokes and Dsmc Simulationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For this reason, fine resolution (cell size and time step) is required for the flare region in a DSMC simulation. Subsequent DSMC simulations [29] have improved the resolution and produced excellent results, compared with the experimental data. The MONACO code, as already described, is used to calculate the flowfield and surface properties for the preceding run-11 flow conditions using both mesh 2 and mesh 3.…”
Section: Full Navier-stokes and Dsmc Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%