1987
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9317(87)90019-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct writing laser lithography for production of microstructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The required ratio between line distance L (digital pixel size or address grid) and spot size d of the writing beam has been calculated numerically assuming Gaussian beam conditions. 9 At a ratio d/L > 2, edge roughness is expected to be smaller than 0.1 ,m. A larger ratio should lead to smoother edges at the expense of increasing the writing time by a factor 1/L 2 .…”
Section: Ill Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The required ratio between line distance L (digital pixel size or address grid) and spot size d of the writing beam has been calculated numerically assuming Gaussian beam conditions. 9 At a ratio d/L > 2, edge roughness is expected to be smaller than 0.1 ,m. A larger ratio should lead to smoother edges at the expense of increasing the writing time by a factor 1/L 2 .…”
Section: Ill Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The shape and dimension of such patterns can be eventually improved by employing and controlling a number of laser beams and the angle between them [ 41 ]. In addition to the laser properties, the spot size, the photoresist material, and the acceptable writing speed are also important requirements for creating a high fidelity pattern [ 42 ]. Despite the fact that this method can achieve finely patterned structures [ 43 , 44 ], there are cases in which the relief model is different from the design, which is inclusively due to mechanical instabilities and deformations caused by the processes of chemical development and drying or by the mechanical drifting of the focal spot position with respect to the sample [ 45 ].…”
Section: Top–down Lithographic Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the direct laser lithography system is evaluated mainly based on the system parameters pertaining to the laser-writing tool and the light source [2]. Effective lithography system requires a precise laser focusing and a complete crosslinking of the photoresist [3]. Precise focusing enhances the performance and the resolution needed for the fabrication [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%