2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-013-9343-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direction-changing fall control of humanoid robots: theory and experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To accelerate the computation, various simplified models have been proposed to approximate falling motions, such as an inverted pendulum [7], [8], a planar robot in the sagittal plane [9], a tripod [10], and a sequence of inverted pendulums [1]. In spite of the effort to reduce the computation, most of the optimization-based techniques are still too slow for real-time applications, with the exception of the work done by Goswami et al [11], who proposed to compute the optimal stepping location to change the falling direction. In contrast, our work takes the approach of policy learning using deep reinforcement learning techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accelerate the computation, various simplified models have been proposed to approximate falling motions, such as an inverted pendulum [7], [8], a planar robot in the sagittal plane [9], a tripod [10], and a sequence of inverted pendulums [1]. In spite of the effort to reduce the computation, most of the optimization-based techniques are still too slow for real-time applications, with the exception of the work done by Goswami et al [11], who proposed to compute the optimal stepping location to change the falling direction. In contrast, our work takes the approach of policy learning using deep reinforcement learning techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only three studies have been reported for biped robots [4], [17], [28]. The focus for these studies were prediction of a fall before it occurs and taking corrective measures to prevent the fall.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior approaches have either used the internal joints of the robot to resist disturbances (e.g. ankle strategy, hip strategy [1], [2], or inertial shaping [3]) or external contacts (e.g., protective stepping [4], knee contact [5], hand contact [6], [7]). However, these strategies have been considered in isolation and there have been limited attempts to unify multiple strategies into a single fall mitigation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%