2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional complex-valued coherence attributes for discontinuous edge detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In seismology, cross-correlation is often used to evaluate the coherencies between waveforms from different stations (Wang et al 2016). It has been widely used to estimate signal delay times (VanDecar & Crosson 1990) and in seismic interferometry (Halliday & Curtis 2008;Wapenaar et al 2011).…”
Section: Multichannel Coherency Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In seismology, cross-correlation is often used to evaluate the coherencies between waveforms from different stations (Wang et al 2016). It has been widely used to estimate signal delay times (VanDecar & Crosson 1990) and in seismic interferometry (Halliday & Curtis 2008;Wapenaar et al 2011).…”
Section: Multichannel Coherency Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, ; Gersztenkorn and Marfurt ; van Bemmel and Pepper ; Cohen and Coifman ; Tingdahl and de Rooij ; Al‐Dossary, Wang and McFarlane ; Di and Gao ; Wang et al . ). However, besides the faults, the discontinuity analysis also highlights some certain non‐faulting features, such as salt domes and diapirs, stratigraphic channels and coherent noises present in seismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, as the first edge-detection tool, the coherence attribute (Bahorich and Farmer, 1995) estimates the lateral similarity of seismic waveforms and thereby is effective in depicting the faults and stratigraphic features that obviously break the waveform continuity. Since its popularity, a number of variations and schemes have been developed in improving such attribute (e.g., Luo et al, 1996;Marfurt et al, 1998;Gersztenkorn and Marfurt, 1999;Cohen and Coifman, 2002;Tingdahl and de Rooij, 2005;Di and Gao, 2014;Wang et al, 2016). While clearly highlighting the major faults of apparent displacements, however, most of the edge-detection tools are less efficient for subtle structure interpretation, such as fracture characterization and facies analysis, in which the lateral variation of seismic signals is subtle and beyond the resolution of edge detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%