2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.94.121404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional-dependent thickness and bending rigidity of phosphorene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a single layer black phosphorus, the resistance to bending is highly anisotropic with the values for B of ~4.8 and ~7.9 eV for the direction perpendicular and parallel to the pucker, respectively [126], using the valence force field model to describe the atomic interactions. Similar results obtained by atomistic simulations and also deviations from the classical plate model were observed which is reflected into a directional dependent thickness [127]. For a monolayer of hBN, molecular dynamic simulations predict the bending stiffness to be 0.86 eV [128] and 1.54 eV [129], while values obtained by density functional theory are 0.95 eV [130] and 1.29 eV [131].…”
Section: Bending Rigiditysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…For a single layer black phosphorus, the resistance to bending is highly anisotropic with the values for B of ~4.8 and ~7.9 eV for the direction perpendicular and parallel to the pucker, respectively [126], using the valence force field model to describe the atomic interactions. Similar results obtained by atomistic simulations and also deviations from the classical plate model were observed which is reflected into a directional dependent thickness [127]. For a monolayer of hBN, molecular dynamic simulations predict the bending stiffness to be 0.86 eV [128] and 1.54 eV [129], while values obtained by density functional theory are 0.95 eV [130] and 1.29 eV [131].…”
Section: Bending Rigiditysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Comparisons for other directions cannot be made due to the unavailability of experimental/DFT studies in literature, as also noted in the introduction. In the case of phosphorene, there has been a recent study on its directiondependent bending modulus using the tight binding approximation [36]. While there is reasonable agreement in the qualitative features between [36] and the current work, there are significant quantitative differences, with values deviating by as much as 2 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…These efforts have generally focused on tensile deformations, since bending requires sophisticated experiments with high accuracy in measurements [8];and ab initio DFT simulations are computationally intensive, scaling cubically with system size, which makes them nonviable at practically relevant bending curvatures [35]. Indeed, such studies can be performed using computationally cheaper alternatives such as tight binding [36][37][38] and classical force fields [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. However, these methods typically lack the resolution required to study nanoscale systems such as monolayers, as is evident by the significant scatter in the reported bending moduli values for even elemental monolayers, e.g., 0.8 to 2.7 eV for graphene [39,46], and 0.4 to 38 eV for silicene [43,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, abundant theoretical attempts have been done to explore these properties depending on the interlayer spacing or layer thickness besides the efforts experimentally, such as the bandgap engineering by vdW epitaxy, , the superlubricity triggered by pressure, , the adhesion and frictional force depends on the interface charge density . Even few literature reports , have pointed out that the existing definition of layer thickness is unsuitably extended to the nanosheets with single or several atomic layers. However, these efforts take only either the intralayer or the interlayer into account to analyze the major issue that they focused on due to the absence of a well-defined boundary between layer (intralayer/in-plane) and interlayer at the nanoscale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%