2018
DOI: 10.14210/contrapontos.v18n1.p102-114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diretrizes Curriculares Para a Formação Docente: Percepções De Professores Formadores

Abstract: O objetivo deste artigo é discutir como os professores que atuam em disciplinas relacionadas às práticas pedagógicas percebem os impactos das diretrizes curriculares para a formação inicial. Esta pesquisa, de abordagem qualitativa, obteve os dados por meio de entrevista com professores que atuam em cursos de licenciatura. A análise dos dados pautou-se nas diretrizes nacionais (BRASIL, 2002; 2015) e em teóricos como Tardif (2011), Imbernón (2011) e Dourado (2015). Os resultados apontam que, para os formadores, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, as one panellist, Voigt, put it, the assessment should be of whether there was '"awareness" … of the significant likelihood of serious damage in the sense of being aware or [having the potential to be] aware based on publicly accessible information and data'. 120 Indeed, even the Panel's Commentary demonstrates that it hopes and expects that its mental element test will, in fact, be interpreted according to the lower standard of 'recklessness or dolus eventualis'. 121 As the reader may have discerned, the Panel's position on the mental element for ecocide is confusing and contradictory.…”
Section: The Panel's Proposal For the Mental Element Of Ecocidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, as one panellist, Voigt, put it, the assessment should be of whether there was '"awareness" … of the significant likelihood of serious damage in the sense of being aware or [having the potential to be] aware based on publicly accessible information and data'. 120 Indeed, even the Panel's Commentary demonstrates that it hopes and expects that its mental element test will, in fact, be interpreted according to the lower standard of 'recklessness or dolus eventualis'. 121 As the reader may have discerned, the Panel's position on the mental element for ecocide is confusing and contradictory.…”
Section: The Panel's Proposal For the Mental Element Of Ecocidementioning
confidence: 99%