The
article demonstrated diverse binding modes of deprotonated
1,3-di(2-pyridinyl)-1,3-propanedione (HL) (κ2-[O,O]−, κ2-[N,O]−, and
μ-bis-κ2-[N,O]−) on selective
ruthenium platforms: Ru(acac)2 (dimeric [1]ClO4), Ru(bpy)2 (monomeric [2]ClO4), Ru(pap)2 (isomeric monomeric [3]ClO4/[4]ClO4, dimeric
[5](ClO4)3), and Ru(PPh3)2(CO) (monomeric 6, isomeric dimeric [7]ClO4/[8]ClO4) (acac =
acetylacetonate, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, pap =
2-phenylazopyridine). Structural authentication of the complexes revealed
(i) diverse binding mode of L– including its unprecedented
bridging mode in [8]ClO4, (ii) varying degrees
of nonplanarity of L–, and (iii) development of
1D polymeric chains or dimeric/tetrameric forms via intermolecular
π–π interactions. The preferential binding feature
of L– in the complexes could also be corroborated
by their calculated relative energies. The analysis of the multiredox
steps of the complexes suggested severe mixing of metal–ligand
frontier orbitals, which in effect pinpointed the involvement of L– in both the oxidative and reductive processes along
the redox chain, suggesting its bidirectional noninnocence under the
present coordination situations. Though α-diketone or β-diketiminate
was reported to activate O2 on the selective Ru(acac)2 platform, the inability of analogous β-diketonate-derived
[1]ClO4 could be attributed to its calculated
greater HOMO–LUMO energy gap, which disfavored electron exchange
at the metal(RuIII)–ligand(L
–
) interface to introduce the required unpaired spin at the
ligand backbone toward the 3O2 activation event.