2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2418297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disagreeable Privacy Policies: Mismatches between Meaning and Userss Understanding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
145
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, privacy policies, being long, complicated documents full of legal jargon, are sub-optimal for communicating information to individuals (Cranor, 2012;Cate, 2010;Reidenberg et al, 2015). Antón et al (2002) conducted a study in which they identified multiple privacy-related goals in accordance with Fair Information Practices, which included 'Choice/Consent' as one of the protection goals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, privacy policies, being long, complicated documents full of legal jargon, are sub-optimal for communicating information to individuals (Cranor, 2012;Cate, 2010;Reidenberg et al, 2015). Antón et al (2002) conducted a study in which they identified multiple privacy-related goals in accordance with Fair Information Practices, which included 'Choice/Consent' as one of the protection goals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the more specific the privacy policy (e.g., a policy that includes the type of information and how it is used), the less agreement consumers have in interpreting the notice, and the greater chance that the notice will be misunderstood by the average consumer (Reidenberg et al 2014); that is, respondents miss the nuances of the policy (Kelley et al 2010). When privacy expectations are highly dependent on contextual factors, such as the type of information and how it is used, consumers' judgments about privacy notices are typically broad and do not take the particular context into consideration.…”
Section: Factors That Influence Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While research has highlighted the importance of allowing data legibility, negotiability and agency through control [32] to the users, there still remains an explicit call for the technological embodiment of these principles. Users are continued to be presented with incomprehensible privacy statements [31,37], followed by acceptance statements where the users are constrained to binary choices [45] dictated by service providers often leading to low levels of understanding and very little space to exercise control [43].…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%