Aquatic Microbial Ecology and Biogeochemistry: A Dual Perspective 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30259-1_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discerning the Causes of Toxic Cyanobacteria (Lyngbya majuscula) Blooms in Moreton Bay, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that significant volumes of fresh groundwater transport through the soil profiles at depth, transporting chemical solutes (including dissolved Fe(II)) to the adjacent intertidal area in Deception Bay, Queensland, Australia (Albert et al, 2005). The benthic release of Fe(II) was further validated through additional field and laboratory studies (Ahern et al, 2006a;Hanington et al, 2016;O'Neil and Dennison, 2016). Additionally, as emphasized in Section 4.4, biogeochemical mechanisms, particularly microbial reduction processes driven by Fe-reducing bacteria, may potentially convert Fe(III) to Fe(II) under anaerobic conditions, thereby facilitating the remobilization of Fe oxides in marine sediments.…”
Section: Sources Of Fe and Mobilization Of Subterranean Fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that significant volumes of fresh groundwater transport through the soil profiles at depth, transporting chemical solutes (including dissolved Fe(II)) to the adjacent intertidal area in Deception Bay, Queensland, Australia (Albert et al, 2005). The benthic release of Fe(II) was further validated through additional field and laboratory studies (Ahern et al, 2006a;Hanington et al, 2016;O'Neil and Dennison, 2016). Additionally, as emphasized in Section 4.4, biogeochemical mechanisms, particularly microbial reduction processes driven by Fe-reducing bacteria, may potentially convert Fe(III) to Fe(II) under anaerobic conditions, thereby facilitating the remobilization of Fe oxides in marine sediments.…”
Section: Sources Of Fe and Mobilization Of Subterranean Fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in Figure 4, early research revealed the elevated concentration of dissolved Fe(II) in the streams flowing into Deception Bay (northwest end of Moreton Bay), Queensland, Australia [40]. It has been identified as a key factor contributing to the occurrence of Lynbya blooms in the coastal area [41]. Subsequent field studies on the Deception Bay catchment and Caboolture River sub-catchment (Queensland, Australia) discovered that the outcropping sediments contained ironstone and Fe minerals (up to 8.5%).…”
Section: Field Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual model of CUA systems has been in existence for 20 years, with the GDT recognized as an important pathway for delivering land-derived chemicals (e.g., N, P, Fe, and DOM) to nearshore environments [11]. This potentially contributes to coastal pollution, as Lyngbya blooms were reported in many parts of Queensland, Australia [41], which threaten coral populations and marine ecosystems. To date, most research efforts have been devoted to addressing physical processes in intertidal areas, with little emphasis on their coupling with geochemical processes (e.g., oxidative precipitation of Fe(II)).…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps and Research Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%