2018
DOI: 10.3390/app8081294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discharge Characteristics and Plasma Erosion of Various Dielectric Materials in the Dielectric Barrier Discharges

Abstract: The objective of this study is the investigation of dielectric barrier discharges (DBDs) with the solid plates and the flexible polymer films. A high capacitance with a high dielectric constant and a small thickness is responsible for the discharge of a high plasma current with a low operation voltage; here, the thin flexible polyimide film ensured a high capacitance, and is comparable to the thick solid-plate alumina. In the long-duration test of the dielectric-surface plasma erosion, the solid plates show a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During experimental tests, the discharge power ranged from P = 1.10 W up to 2.0 W, with a supply voltage from V = 7.0 kV to 12 kV. In DBD systems, the power of lightning is influenced by several factors, the most important of which are; frequency of the supply system, supply voltage, dielectric type [10,14], distance between HV and GND electrodes, geometry of electrodes [11][12][13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During experimental tests, the discharge power ranged from P = 1.10 W up to 2.0 W, with a supply voltage from V = 7.0 kV to 12 kV. In DBD systems, the power of lightning is influenced by several factors, the most important of which are; frequency of the supply system, supply voltage, dielectric type [10,14], distance between HV and GND electrodes, geometry of electrodes [11][12][13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irreversible damage to the dielectric could be avoided by choosing non-porous hydrophobic materials that do not become hydrophilic by plasma activation, nor are degraded by plasma exposure. FR4 absorbs 0.5% water by volume at room temperature and RH = 100% [24]; polyimide absorbs approximately twice as much water [30], whereas polypropylene tends to oxidize if heated [31], and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is degraded by plasma, as are many polymers and polymer coatings. Finally, high quality alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) and aluminum nitride appear to be the best candidates, not only for their dielectric properties and their immunity to moisture absorption, but also for their biological compatibility [32,33], although they are mildly hydrophilic.…”
Section: Dielectric Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To convert that energy into a heat flux, it is assumed that all of the kinetic energy the ions have as they bombard the surface is dissipated as heat. This is justified by the experimental evidence that air plasmas in contact with an alumina surface show no evidence of sputtering despite extended periods of operation time [42]. Thus, both mechanisms were deemed unlikely to be significant.…”
Section: Dominant Heating Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%