2018
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1462766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disciplinary differences and implications for the development of generic skills: a study of engineering and business students’ perceptions of generic skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
39
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Cech (2014) points to the precipitous decline in students' beliefs about the importance of understanding the consequences of technology and understanding how people use machines during engineering education. When comparing engineering and business students' perceptions of generic skills, Chan and Fong (2018) found that engineering students perceived self-management skills, interpersonal and communication skills, and community and citizenship knowledge less important than business students. Of all the listed generic skills, engineering students perceived the awareness of political, social, economic and environmental issues as the least important to their future career (Chan and Fong 2018).…”
Section: Engineering Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cech (2014) points to the precipitous decline in students' beliefs about the importance of understanding the consequences of technology and understanding how people use machines during engineering education. When comparing engineering and business students' perceptions of generic skills, Chan and Fong (2018) found that engineering students perceived self-management skills, interpersonal and communication skills, and community and citizenship knowledge less important than business students. Of all the listed generic skills, engineering students perceived the awareness of political, social, economic and environmental issues as the least important to their future career (Chan and Fong 2018).…”
Section: Engineering Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a validated questionnaire, Chan et al [9] investigated the perceived importance of and competency levels in 38 skills of first-year engineering students at three universities in Hong Kong. The same questionnaire was used later by Chan and Fong [19] to compare the perceptions of competency importance and levels between engineering and business students in Hong Kong.…”
Section: A Transversal Competencies In Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disciplinary knowledge is considered more relevant than generic skills (Chang and Fong, 2018). In contrast, soft fields emphasize "student development" more as their primary teaching objective (Barnes et al, 2001), placing greater relevance on broad general knowledge, on student character development and on effective thinking skills such as critical thinking (Braxton, 1995).…”
Section: Disciplinary Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%