2003
DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2003.10510623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disclosure of innovation activities by high-technology firms

Abstract: This study investigates management incentive to disclose non-GAAP indicators concerning innovation in high-technology industries and the usefulness of the disclosure. As predicted, we find that firms increase disclosures of innovation when current earnings are less informative, or when future earnings are more uncertain. This finding is consistent with firms increasing disclosure in response to investor information demands when accounting data are less useful in assessing firm value. We also find that disclosu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, voluntary disclosures may contribute to more accurate value estimation of young companies [Amir, Lev 1996] than financial figures concerning past earnings [Kim, Ritter 1999]. Gu and Li [2003] validated a hypothesis that younger companies disclose more about their innovation activities. They evidenced statistically relevant negative association between the company age and total disclosure index of innovative activities as well as between the company age and partial indices, including disclosures on strategy, progress, commercialization and completion of innovations.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, voluntary disclosures may contribute to more accurate value estimation of young companies [Amir, Lev 1996] than financial figures concerning past earnings [Kim, Ritter 1999]. Gu and Li [2003] validated a hypothesis that younger companies disclose more about their innovation activities. They evidenced statistically relevant negative association between the company age and total disclosure index of innovative activities as well as between the company age and partial indices, including disclosures on strategy, progress, commercialization and completion of innovations.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The problem of R&D disclosure has been remarked and highlighted in many empirical research studies carried out by: Entwistle [1999], Gu andLi [2003] Jones [2007], Merkley [2014], La Rosa and Liberatore [2014] and Nekhili et al [2016], whereas factors affecting both strategy and R&D disclosures were examined by Napoli [2013] on a sample of R&D intensive companies listed on the Milan Stock Exchange. Napoli [2013] validated three hypotheses: (1) firms with higher R&D intensity make more R&D disclosure; (2) firms with higher R&D intensity make more disclosure of their strategy; (3) younger firms make more disclosure about their strategy.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Percy (2000), companies with a high level of R&D persistently disclose asymmetrical information and present significant monitoring costs of the disclosure between managers and investors. According to Gelb (2002) and Gu and Li (2003), the companies with a significant level of R&D and advertising costs disclose more voluntary and flexible information about their R&D projects in the annual reports. This paper therefore analyzes companies from the ICT and Pharmaceutical Industry listed on the Stock Exchange of the two countries.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…O segundo sinal é o esforço inovador (H2), demonstrando quão comprometida com a inovação é a empresa. Espera-se, neste estudo, que os gastos com P&D sinalizem a perspectiva de obtenção de vantagens competitivas futuras para os investidores, incrementando assim o valor das firmas, como sugere uma parcela da literatura mencionada (AZEVEDO; GUTIERREZ, 2009;GU;LI, 2003;LEE;SHIM, 1995), por meio do impacto positivo no crescimento ou no desempenho das empresas. Essa perspectiva é contrária aos resultados obtidos por Alves et al (2001), Santos et al (2014)…”
Section: Introductionunclassified