2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2003.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discontinuity of the Mozumi–Sukenobu fault low-velocity zone, central Japan, inferred from 3-D finite-difference simulation of fault zone waves excited by explosive sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last 20 years various studies used FZ trapped waves to characterize the internal structure of large fault and earthquake rupture zones (e.g. Li & Leary 1990; Li et al 1994; Rovelli et al 2002; Ben‐Zion et al 2003; Haberland et al 2003; Mamada et al 2004; Wang et al 2009). The presence of trapped waves implies a uniform or smoothly varying continuous tabular zone of damage in a region between the recording stations and the generating events (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 20 years various studies used FZ trapped waves to characterize the internal structure of large fault and earthquake rupture zones (e.g. Li & Leary 1990; Li et al 1994; Rovelli et al 2002; Ben‐Zion et al 2003; Haberland et al 2003; Mamada et al 2004; Wang et al 2009). The presence of trapped waves implies a uniform or smoothly varying continuous tabular zone of damage in a region between the recording stations and the generating events (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the observations of FZ trapped waves due to sources well outside the fault imply that the trapping structures are overall limited to the stable (velocity strengthening) uppermost portion of the crust that is above the seismicity and largely mechanically passive. Shallow trapping structures were also found for faults in central Italy (Rovelli et al 2002) and central Japan (Mamada et al 2004). The results imply that FZ trapped waves are generally not useful for in situ characterization of FZ structure in the depth range where earthquakes nucleate and the majority of co‐seismic slip occurs (3–15 km).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, seismic velocity values are decreased across the Mozumi fault relative to the wall rock (Table 5 and Figure 9). The average P wave and S wave velocities determined from the seismic studies for protolith are 4.6–4.9 km/s and ∼2.6–3.0 km/s, respectively [ Mamada et al , 2004; Mizuno et al , 2004]. Four types of fault zone structures are recognized, including fractures along borehole A (Figure 6), lithology changes, including clay composition, foliation and other microstructures, and heterogeneity of physical and mechanical properties [ Forster et al , 2003; this study].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rock samples from drilled core associated with the Active Fault Survey Tunnel (AFST) and continuous borehole geophysical logs are combined with data on porosity and permeability to document the variations in fault zone properties across the fault. We discuss the results in light of a recent study of inversion of fault zone waves in the Mozumi fault [ Mamada et al , 2004; Mizuno et al , 2004] and in situ hydraulic tests [ Nohara et al , 2006] to document the relationship between deformation mechanisms, alteration, and elastic properties of the fault zone. This work provides data on the in situ chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of the internal portion of an active fault in clastic sedimentary rocks in the upper portion of the crust, but at depths where weathering has not disturbed the textures and structures associated with faulting and fluid flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%