1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00016267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discontinuous crack-tip elements: Application to 3D boundary element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For quadrilateral elements, the node shift is presented with a similar definition as triangular elements shown in Fig. 15, Mi and Aliabadi [1994] chose the node shift as 1/2 and the error less 4%, Subia et al [1995] considered that the node shift equals to 1/3 is the best but between 1/20 and 3/5 is relatively constant for the results, Guzina et al [2006] regarded the node shift in the range 1/20-1/4 is optimal. In view of the above node shift selection, we select node shift as 1/20, 1/10, 1/6, 1/4, 1/3, 1/2 and 3/5, and compare the stress results at Z-direction (traction adding direction) with analytical solution.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quadrilateral elements, the node shift is presented with a similar definition as triangular elements shown in Fig. 15, Mi and Aliabadi [1994] chose the node shift as 1/2 and the error less 4%, Subia et al [1995] considered that the node shift equals to 1/3 is the best but between 1/20 and 3/5 is relatively constant for the results, Guzina et al [2006] regarded the node shift in the range 1/20-1/4 is optimal. In view of the above node shift selection, we select node shift as 1/20, 1/10, 1/6, 1/4, 1/3, 1/2 and 3/5, and compare the stress results at Z-direction (traction adding direction) with analytical solution.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many special crack front elements have been defined to capture the asymptotic behavior of a specific node in the FEM [1]. In the 3D BEM, however, the available crack front elements are only of quadrilateral type, such as 8-node crack front elements proposed by Mi and Aliabadi [5], 9-node crack front elements in the pioneering work of Li et al [6], and also crack front elements in the work of Pan and Yuan [7]. e crack front elements of the triangular type have not been found by authors [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the crack surfaces, the relative crack opening displacement (RCOD) [Ammons and Vable (1996); Chang and Mear (1996)] or the tangential derivative of the RCOD [Xie, Zhang, Huang et al (2013)] can be chosen as unknowns therefore the traction boundary integral equation only needs to be considered on either side of crack surfaces. Recently, Mi et al [Mi and Aliabadi (1994)] proposed a promising single-domain method named direct traction boundary integral method for three-dimensional crack problems. In this study, a direct traction boundary integral method for two-dimensional crack problems is presented as a complementary formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%