2017
DOI: 10.1137/16m1056171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discontinuous Finite Element Methods for Interface Problems: Robust A Priori and A Posteriori Error Estimates

Abstract: For elliptic interface problems, this paper studies residual-based a posteriori error estimations for discontinuous finite element approximations. For the Crouzeix-Raviart nonconforming and the discontinuous Galerkin elements in both two-and three-dimensions, the global reliability bounds are established with constants independent of the jump of the diffusion coefficient. Moreover, we obtain these estimates with no assumption on the distribution of the diffusion coefficient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we introduce the improved trace inequality. The proof of this lemma can be found in [11,Lemma 2.4] for the vector case; the proof of the tensor case is trival.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we introduce the improved trace inequality. The proof of this lemma can be found in [11,Lemma 2.4] for the vector case; the proof of the tensor case is trival.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the low regularity case, we introduced a speical projection operator in our earlier HDG work [18] to avoid the quantity q · n ∂T h in the analysis; however, this complicated the analysis. In this work, we use an improved inverse inequality from [5], and simplify the error analysis for the low regularity case. It is worth mentioning that part of our analysis (step 1 to step 3 in Section 3.3) improves the existing EDG error analysis by dealing with the case of low regularity solutions.…”
Section: Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the techniques in the previous EDG works are not applicable for the Dirichlet boundary control problem since the regularity of the solution may be low. Instead of introducing a special projection as in [18], we use an improved trace inequality from [5] to deal with the low regularity solution. We improve the existing EDG error analysis by dealing with the case of low regularity solutions; also this is the first work to give a rigorous error analysis for the IEDG method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low regularity may lead to reduced accuracy for numerical approximations [2,47]. In literature there are usually two types of methods to improve the numerical accuracy, interface(or body)-fitted methods [6,9,14,36,26,11] and interface-unfitted methods. For the interface-fitted methods, meshes aligned with the interface are used so as to dominate the approximation error caused by the non-smoothness of solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%