Discourse and Conflict

Kakava, Christina

doi:10.1002/9780470753460.ch34

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to social power, other/addressee compliance can be affected by language choices. Speakers (groups or institutions) may choose one of two types of arguments, whether rhetorical or oppositional, depend on their position (Christina Kakavá, 2001). By rhetorical, they present an intact discourse supporting disputable position.…”

Section: Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual-Text Integration in Digital Public Service Announcement: A Strategy to Fight Fake News Spread

Sari,

Tawami

2023

Aksara

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate public service announcements (PSA’s): how visual and verbal rhetoric modes present an intended message. Differences in modes suggest different effects, and rhetoric promotes the power to persuade and convince others. As the growing interest in social media use, PSAs become a complex example of multimodal communication: combining verbal texts and visual images establish natural language in this world. The study looked at the question, how the combinations of texts and images work. Within this scope, Kress & van Leeuwen’s Visual Grammar theory and Halliday’s SFL theory were applied along with SF-MDA suggested by O’Halloran & Lim-Fei. The method of analytic descriptive qualitative allows the study to investigate and explain the issue elaborately. The results of this study show the combinations of all resources potentially motivate interactive participants to do the action after the investment of knowledge. Due to the increased importance of social movement, it is estimated that the findings potentially contribute to represent values intended by both public and private sectors. AbstrakTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi bagaimana retorika moda visual dan verbal menyampaikan pesan dalam pengumuman layanan umum. Perbedaan penggunaan moda menunjukkan dampak yang berbeda, sedangkan retorika memperlihatkan adanya kuasa untuk mempengaruhi dan meyakinkan orang lain. Dengan tingginya minat untuk menggunakan media sosial, PSA menjadi contoh komunikasi multimodal yang kompleks karena menggabungkan teks verbal dan gambar visual untuk menciptakan bahasa alami. Penelitian ini menjawab pertanyaan tentang bagaimana kombinasi teks dan gambar bekerja. Dalam cakupan ini, teori Tata Bahasa Visual oleh Kress & van Leeuwen dan teori SFL oleh Halliday diterapkan bersama dengan SF-MDA yang dicetuskan oleh O'Halloran & Lim-Fei. Metode deskriptif kualitatif analitis memungkinkan penelitian ini untuk menyelidiki dan menjelaskan masalah secara rinci. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kombinasi semua sumber daya berpotensi memotivasi individu yang berinteraksi untuk melakukan tindakan yang disarankan setelah mereka memahami teorinya. Mengingat pentingnya aktivitas sosial, temuan ini diindikasikan berkontribusi dalam merepresentasikan nilai-nilai yang diinginkan oleh sektor publik maupun swasta.

show abstract

Section: Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual-Text Integration in Digital Public Service Announcement: A Strategy to Fight Fake News Spread

Sari,

Tawami

2023

Aksara

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From a disciplinary perspective, there are mainly conversation analysis and pragmatics analysis, but also sociolinguistic and cognitive linguistic analysis of conflict talk. Kakavá reviewed different studies on conflict talk in language use and its main linguistic structural features, and divided similar studies into three areas, which provided the theoretical basis for later analysis [5]. Zhao used structural analysis to divide conflict talk into three parts: the initiating moves, oppositional moves and terminating moves [1].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conversation Analysis of Conflict Talk between Couples in Why Women Kill

Xie¹

2022

IJEH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conflict talk is a natural but complicated language phenomenon and is one of the main focuses of linguistic research. Based on the Conversation Analysis Theory, this paper uses the TV series Why Women Kill as the source of corpus and is concerned with the development process and manifestation of the conflict talk in the initiating moves, oppositional moves and terminating moves. Through the observation and analysis of the conflict talk, the paper shows that the speaker’s identity, status, the social era in which he or she lives, and ethnicity all contribute to the choice of turn- taking.

show abstract

“…Discourse is treated as a coherent and cohesive sequence of utterances where speaker-utterance and interpreter-utterance relationships are more important than the relationship of one utterance to another (Brown & Yule, 1983;Schiffrin, 1994;Widdowson, 2004). Hate speech is seen as a kind of conflict talk where the emotional mind shapes the communicative context and contributes to the verbalisation of the speakers' negative emotions (Kakava, 2003;Paronyan, 2009;Paronyan & Bekaryan, 2013;Paronyan & Rostomyan, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Euphemism to Verbal Aggression in British and Armenian Cultures

Ayunts

Paronyan

2021

FLEKS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The topic of the present article concerns verbal aggression and focusses on the verbal expression of the emotional mind; specifically, the expression of negative feelings, emotions and attitudes. Since computer-mediated communication is widely used to shape and reshape public opinion, the analysis of hate speech on the material of internet discourse may shed light on the manipulative communicative tactics that are used in online media and social networking sites to spread hostility and negativity globally. Hence, the examination of the language strategies and tactics that are used to formulate hate speech becomes essential in communicatively oriented linguistic studies. The present article provides a comparative analysis of manifestations of hate speech and euphemisms in Armenian and British online media outlets and social sites targeted towards people's sexual orientation. The aim of the paper is to show the close connection between hate speech and culture. The research, which embarks on two basically different cultures – British and Armenian – is carried out within the framework of cross-cultural pragmatics and discourse analysis. A qualitative research method is applied to analyse samples of hate speech. Social sites and online media outlets were searched through search engines, using certain keywords (LGBT, sexual minorities, etc.). For the purpose of the study, language resources from English and Armenian – words, expressions, constructions, speech acts expressing hostile attitudes towards sexual orientation – have been picked out and analysed.

show abstract

Discourse and Conflict

Cited by 8 publications

References 63 publications

Visual-Text Integration in Digital Public Service Announcement: A Strategy to Fight Fake News Spread

Visual-Text Integration in Digital Public Service Announcement: A Strategy to Fight Fake News Spread

Conversation Analysis of Conflict Talk between Couples in Why Women Kill

From Euphemism to Verbal Aggression in British and Armenian Cultures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About