Discourse cohesion in text and tutorial dialogue

Abstract

Discourse cohesion is presumably an important facilitator of comprehension when individuals read texts and holdconversations. This study investigated components of cohesion and language in different types of discourse about Newtonian physics: A textbook, textoids written by experimental psychologists, naturalistic tutorial dialogue between expert human tutors and college students, and AutoTutor tutorial dialogue between a computer tutor and students (AutoTutor is an animated pedagogical agent that helps students learn about physics by holding conversations in natural language). We analyzed the four types of discourse with Coh-Metrix, a software tool that measures discourse on different components of cohesion, language, and readability. The cohesion indices included co-reference, syntactic and semantic similarity, causal cohesion, incidence of cohesion signals (e.g., connectives, logical operators), and many other measures. Cohesion data were quite similar for the two forms of discourse in expository monologue (textbooks and textoids) and for the two types of tutorial dialogue (i.e., students interacting with human tutors and AutoTutor), but very different between the discourse of expository monologue and tutorial dialogue. Coh-Metrix was also able to detect subtle differences in the language and discourse of AutoTutor versus human tutoring. Arthur C. Graesser et al. • Discourse cohesion in text and tutorial dialogue idj 15(3), 2007, 199-213 Arthur C. Graesser et al. • Discourse cohesion in text and tutorial dialogue idj 15(

Language and Discourse Analysis with Coh-Metrix: Applications from Educational Material to Learning Environments at Scale

“…This traditional granularity uses the individual as the unit of analysis both to understand behavioural characteristics of individuals working within groups and to measure performance or knowledge-building outcomes of the individuals' in-group contexts. However, the present findings support the claims of many in the computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) community to also consider group levels of granularity in discourse tracking (Graesser, Jeon, Yan, & Cai, 2007).…”

Community crosstalk: an exploratory analysis of destination and festival eWOM on Twitter

“…Voyant was used to analyse the text using the following statistics: frequency, Z score and normalized use per 10,000 words. These statistics were used to enable comparison across hubs which may have different volumes of discussion (Graesser, Jeon, Yan, & Cai, 2007). The highest ranked 100 words by raw and normalized frequency were identified in each hub and reviewed to determine terms that relate to specific Bournemouth destination elements.…”

Cohesion in multimodal documents

“…This form of (deictic) cross-referencing can be understood as a way to establish coherence, through the use of cohesive links (Halliday & Hasan, 1976). Extensive research in the Hallidayan tradition has shown that cohesive links in the text contribute to the perceived coherence of a document.…”

“…In order to quantify the effect of reference between text and depictive material, we first classified different types of reference, following work on cohesion by Halliday & Hasan (1976). We present a summary of cohesion in text, and our classification of reference types, in Section 3.…”

“…In this study, we identify three types of reference, within the framework of previous work on cohesion (Halliday & Hasan, 1976): directive signaling, descriptive signaling, and no signaling in the text to introduce the figure. In an experimental study, we use eye tracking to investigate how those three reference types influence the processing of the material by humans.…”