“…In this respect, studies have foregrounded structural inequalities, lack of demographic representativeness and the role of psychology in transformation and "undoing" apartheid legacies (for example, Ahmed & Pillay, 2004; De la Rey & Ipser, 2004;Pretorius, 2008;Sher & Long, 2012). There has also been increased grappling with issues of cultural, religious and epistemological relevance -particularly efforts at Africanising psychology -gaining momentum in South Africa (for example, Holdstock, 2000;Yen & Wilbraham, 2003a, 2003bMkhize, 2004aMkhize, , 2004bEskell-Blokland, 2005;Patel & Shikongo, 2006; Diale & Fritz, 2007; Baloyi, 2008;Ngcobo & Edwards, 2008;Eskell-Blokland, 2009;Ruane, 2010; Bojuwoye & Edwards, 2011; Eagle & Long, 2011;Edwards, 2011;Makunga, Thwala & Edwards, 2011;Sodi & Bojuwoye, 2011;Ebersöhn, 2012;Matoane, 2012;Theron, Theron & Malindi, 2013 Recommendations around transforming the curriculum have included the following: taking African cultures, languages, healing processes and experiences as the point of departure for the psychology curriculum (Baloyi 2008); establishing departments where postgraduate students research African worldviews in order to create a foundation for an African indigenous psychology (Juma 2011); and introducing dedicated courses in African psychology (Nwoye, 2011;Matoane, 2012;Javangwe, 2013) and dedicated modules on cultural issues (Eagle, 2005;Matoane, 2012). Critical psychologists and others have also cautioned against reproducing essentialised and ahistorical notions of culture and ethnicity in this pursuit (Rashed, 2013) and perpetuating misperceptions that equate culture with black and poor people, but not white and middleclass people (Yen & Wilbraham, 2003b).…”