2011
DOI: 10.1080/10510974.2011.534973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourses on Technology Policy in the Middle East and North Africa: Gender Mainstreaming vs. Local Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discourse analyses of policy have contributed important insights into the types of conflict that occur between gender policy discourses and local understanding of gender issues. For example, Newsom and colleagues’ (2011) analysis of the United Nations’ discourses on gender in technology policy points to their incompatibility with local knowledge drawn on by women’s organisations in the Middle East and north Africa. In a similar vein, Seckinelgin (2009) writes of the homogenising tendency of the categories used in global HIV/AIDS activism, such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) and men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM), and the limits of these discursive frames in representing local sexualities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discourse analyses of policy have contributed important insights into the types of conflict that occur between gender policy discourses and local understanding of gender issues. For example, Newsom and colleagues’ (2011) analysis of the United Nations’ discourses on gender in technology policy points to their incompatibility with local knowledge drawn on by women’s organisations in the Middle East and north Africa. In a similar vein, Seckinelgin (2009) writes of the homogenising tendency of the categories used in global HIV/AIDS activism, such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) and men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM), and the limits of these discursive frames in representing local sexualities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%