2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2218-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering mutated driver genes through a robust and sparse co-regularized matrix factorization framework with prior information from mRNA expression patterns and interaction network

Abstract: BackgroundDiscovery of mutated driver genes is one of the primary objective for studying tumorigenesis. To discover some relatively low frequently mutated driver genes from somatic mutation data, many existing methods incorporate interaction network as prior information. However, the prior information of mRNA expression patterns are not exploited by these existing network-based methods, which is also proven to be highly informative of cancer progressions.ResultsTo incorporate prior information from both intera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, two significant GO biological processes, antigen processing and presentation and interferon-gamma-mediated signaling pathway, are both essential for immune response, which is often observed to be inhibited in the tumor microenvironment [ 7 , 32 ]. In addition, we test the relationship between the functional modules and cancer driver genes [ 33 , 34 ]. By following a previous work [ 35 ], we utilized 2,372 genes from the Network of Cancer Genes (NCG) [ 36 ] as benchmarking cancer genes, including 711 known cancer genes from the Cancer Gene Census (CGC) [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, two significant GO biological processes, antigen processing and presentation and interferon-gamma-mediated signaling pathway, are both essential for immune response, which is often observed to be inhibited in the tumor microenvironment [ 7 , 32 ]. In addition, we test the relationship between the functional modules and cancer driver genes [ 33 , 34 ]. By following a previous work [ 35 ], we utilized 2,372 genes from the Network of Cancer Genes (NCG) [ 36 ] as benchmarking cancer genes, including 711 known cancer genes from the Cancer Gene Census (CGC) [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functionally related driver mutations in the genome, also known as driver modules or pathways, activate the mechanisms by which cancer occurs, triggering cancer, driving cancer progression and giving cancer cells a selective advantage. Some computational methods and mathematical models have been developed to detect driver gene sets, pathways and modules by using large-scale sequencing data (Hou et al, 2016;Zheng et al, 2016;Yang et al, 2017;Xi et al, 2018;Ahmed et al, 2019;Deng et al, 2019;Zhang and Wang, 2019a;Pelegrina et al, 2020). Existing research show that the members of cancer driver modules often exhibit specific mutation patterns in cancer samples, the most significant characteristic is mutual exclusivity (mutex) which means once one member mutates, the tumor will gain a significant selection advantage, while later mutations in other members will not give the tumor a selection advantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the problem of inaccessibility of information, the margin writing of the subgroups, as Driversub method was proposed. Correspondingly, in this method, an unsupervised learning method was used, which needs no information about subgroup [13]. One of the challenges in analyzing the results of this method is that the available data has noise and there is still discarded data, which consequently affects the accuracy of the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%